Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38915353›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2024

Sculpting the future: A narrative review of 3D printing in plastic surgery and prosthetic devices.

Muhammad Jawad Zahid, Parit Mavani, Wireko Andrew Awuah, Mohammad Alabdulrahman, Rachana Punukollu, Arnab Kundu, Arpit Mago, Karam Maher, Favour T Adebusoye, Tehreem Naseer Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Muhammad Jawad ZahidDepartment of Surgery Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar Pakistan.
Parit MavaniB. J. Medical College Ahmedabad India.ORCID 0000-0003-3968-1205
Wireko Andrew AwuahFaculty of Medicine Sumy State University Sumy Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2380-2949
Mohammad AlabdulrahmanSchool of Medicine Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Dublin Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1512-8977
Rachana PunukolluDepartment of Transplant Surgery Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA.
Arnab KunduR.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital Kolkata India.ORCID 0000-0003-3947-2809
Arpit MagoJawaharlal Nehru medical College Belgaum India.
Karam MaherCairo University Cairo Egypt.
Favour T AdebusoyeFaculty of Medicine Sumy State University Sumy Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5362-3920
Tehreem Naseer KhanRehman Medical Institute Peshawar Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: The advent of 3D printing has revolutionized plastic surgery and prosthetic devices, providing personalized solutions for patients with traumatic injuries, deformities, and appearance-related conditions. This review offers a comprehensive overview of 3D printing's applications, advantages, limitations, and future prospects in these fields. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus for studies on 3D printing in plastic surgery. Results: 3D printing has significantly contributed to personalized medical interventions, with benefits like enhanced design flexibility, reduced production time, and improved patient outcomes. Using computer-aided design (CAD) software, precise models tailored to a patient's anatomy can be created, ensuring better fit, functionality, and comfort. 3D printing allows for intricate geometries, leading to improved aesthetic outcomes and patient-specific prosthetic limbs and orthoses. The historical development of 3D printing, key milestones, and breakthroughs are highlighted. Recent progress in bioprinting and tissue engineering shows promising applications in regenerative medicine and transplantation. The integration of AI and automation with 3D printing enhances surgical planning and outcomes. Emerging trends in patient-specific treatment planning and precision medicine are potential game-changers. However, challenges like technical considerations, economic implications, and ethical issues exist. Addressing these challenges and advancing research in materials, design processes, and long-term outcomes are crucial for widespread adoption. Conclusion: The review underscores the increasing adoption of 3D printing in healthcare and its impact on plastic surgery and prosthetic devices. It emphasizes the importance of evaluating the current state and addressing knowledge gaps through future research to foster further advancements.

Indexed as

3D printingcustomizationplastic surgeryprosthetic devices

Identifiers

PMID38915353
PMCPMC11194296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.