Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38915302›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2024

Pulsed Radiofrequency Neuromodulation of the Greater Occipital Nerve for the Treatment of Headache Disorders in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Kyle De Oliveira, Nina Dhondt, Marina Englesakis, Akash Goel, Yasmine Hoydonckx

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06894121 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of the Efficacy of Unilateral and Bilateral Proximal Greater Occipital Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency in the Treatment of Migraine

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2024 to 2026Enrolled217ConditionsMigraine, Greater Occipital Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency, Headache Disorders, Ultrasound Guided Nerve BlockArmsGreater Occipital Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency (Unilateral), Bilateral GON PRF Treatment:
NCT07343427 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Central Sensitization and Migraine Disability Following Greater Occipital Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency: A Prospective Observational Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2026 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsMigraine, Central SensitizationArmsGreater occipital nerve radiofrequency
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kyle De OliveiraDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nina DhondtDepartment of Pain Medicine, Multidisciplinary Pain Center, VITAZ, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
Marina EnglesakisThe Institute of Education Research, Library & Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2199-1056
Akash GoelDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Yasmine HoydonckxDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0893-8813

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pulsed radiofrequency neuromodulation (PRFN) of greater occipital nerve (GON) is considered in patients with headaches failing to achieve sustained analgesic benefit from nerve blocks with local anesthetic and steroids. However, the evidence supporting this practice is unclear. Aims: This narrative systematic review aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of GON PRFN on headaches. Methods: Databases were searched for studies, published up to February 1, 2024, investigating PRFN of GON for adults with headaches. Abstracts and posters were excluded. Primary outcome was change in headache intensity. Secondary outcomes included effect on monthly headache frequency (MHF), mental and physical health, mood, sleep, analgesic consumption, and side-effects. Two reviewers screened and extracted data. Results: Twenty-two papers (2 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 11 cohort, and 9 case reports/series) including 608 patients were identified. Considerable heterogeneity in terms of study design, headache diagnosis, PRF target and settings, and image-guidance was noted. PRFN settings varied (38-42°C, 40-60 V, and 150-400 Ohms). Studies demonstrated PRFN to provide significant analgesia and reduction of MHF in chronic migraine (CM) from 3 to 6 months; and significant pain relief for ON from six to ten months. Mild adverse effects were reported in 3.1% of cohort. A minority of studies reported on secondary outcomes. The quality of the evidence was low. Conclusions: Low-quality evidence indicates an analgesic benefit from PRFN of GON for ON and CM, but its role for other headache types needs more investigation. Optimal PRFN target and settings remain unclear. High-quality RCTs are required to further explore the role of this intervention. PROSPERO ID CRD42022363234.

Indexed as

cephalalgiacephalgiaheadachehemicraniamigraineoccipitaloccipital neuralgiaPulsed radiofrequency neuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID38915302
PMCPMC11195485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.