ArticleThe American journal of case reports2024
Regenerative Endodontic Procedure on an Immature Necrotic Molar: A Case Report with a 5-Year Review.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regenerative Endodontic Procedure in Mandibular First Molar: A Clinical Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Regeneration Versus Granulation Tissue Healing in a Hopeless Mature Mandibular Molar Post-Endodontic Management: A 40-Month Follow-Up Case Report.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Two-Year Outcomes of Regenerative Therapy in an Immature Maxillary Molar With Periapical Abscess: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Mechanistic insights into dental stem cells-derived exosomes in regenerative endodontics.International endodontic journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The regenerative endodontic procedure (REP) for managing necrotic immature permanent teeth has the advantage of promoting root growth over the traditionally used apexification techniques. However, there is limited evidence on the long-term outcome of standardized REPs performed on immature molars. This case report presents the 5-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of REP performed on an immature mandibular first molar. CASE REPORT A healthy 7-year-old girl with a carious right mandibular first molar was referred to the endodontic clinic for evaluation and treatment. Clinical examination showed large occlusal caries, no tenderness to palpation and percussion tests, and no response to cold and electric pulp tests. Radiographic examination showed deep caries, apical radiolucency related to the open apices, and wide root canal space. Accordingly, the tooth was diagnosed with necrotic pulp and asymptomatic apical periodontitis. The REP was performed following the American Association of Endodontics guidelines, which comprise minimal instrumentation, disinfection with sodium hypochlorite irrigant, use of triple antibiotic paste, induced intracanal bleeding, and application of a coronal mineral trioxide aggregate plug. The patient missed the scheduled follow-up appointments but presented at the clinic 5 years later with an asymptomatic tooth. Clinical and radiographic examination revealed no tenderness to percussion and palpation test, no response to cold test, positive response to electric pulp test, apical healing, apical closure, root lengthening, and canal wall thickening and calcification. CONCLUSIONS While true pulp regeneration is unachievable, the REP, following the current protocol, is clinically successful in achieving root maturation and tooth retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.