ReviewClinical diabetes and endocrinology2024
The role of machine learning algorithms in detection of gestational diabetes; a narrative review of current evidence.
Review in Clinical diabetes and endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive Performance of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnant Women: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- ANGPTL4 in gestational diabetes: a diagnostic biomarker linked to placental senescence.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Managing Gestational Diabetes Complexity with Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Graph neural networks for networked analysis of gestational diabetes risk factors: a multi method framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predictive performance of artificial intelligence algorithms for gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- GraphRAG-Enabled Local Large Language Model for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Development of a Proof-of-Concept.JMIR diabetes · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia: a systematic review of machine learning models and clinical decision support systems.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Machine learning based prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus using early pregnancy biomarkers and clinical data.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Chrononutrition in Gestational Diabetes: Toward Precision Timing in Maternal Care.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Optimising hyperparameters with a tree structured Parzen estimator to improve diabetes prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Gestational Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Review
- First-Trimester Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Based on Maternal Risk Factors.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025Article
- Machine learning applications to classify and monitor medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes in Ethiopia.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Review
- Harnessing AI for public health: India's roadmap.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) poses significant health risks to mothers and infants. Early prediction and effective management are crucial to improving outcomes. Machine learning techniques have emerged as powerful tools for GDM prediction. This review compiles and analyses the available studies to highlight key findings and trends in the application of machine learning for GDM prediction. A comprehensive search of relevant studies published between 2000 and September 2023 was conducted. Fourteen studies were selected based on their focus on machine learning for GDM prediction. These studies were subjected to rigorous analysis to identify common themes and trends. The review revealed several key themes. Models capable of predicting GDM risk during the early stages of pregnancy were identified from the studies reviewed. Several studies underscored the necessity of tailoring predictive models to specific populations and demographic groups. These findings highlighted the limitations of uniform guidelines for diverse populations. Moreover, studies emphasised the value of integrating clinical data into GDM prediction models. This integration improved the treatment and care delivery for individuals diagnosed with GDM. While different machine learning models showed promise, selecting and weighing variables remains complex. The reviewed studies offer valuable insights into the complexities and potential solutions in GDM prediction using machine learning. The pursuit of accurate, early prediction models, the consideration of diverse populations, clinical data, and emerging data sources underscore the commitment of researchers to improve healthcare outcomes for pregnant individuals at risk of GDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.