ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2024
Development of a risk prediction model for radiation dermatitis following proton radiotherapy in head and neck cancer using ensemble machine learning.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07149506 (Efficacy of Oral or Topical Catechins vs. Placebo as an Adjuvant for the Prevention and Management of Radiation Dermatitis in Oncology Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Oral or Topical Catechins vs. Placebo as an Adjuvant for the Prevention and Management of Radiation Dermatitis in Oncology Patients: a Randomized Trial
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Practical recommendations for the management of radiodermatitis: on behalf of the ESTRO RTT committee.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Guideline
- Development and validation of a prediction model for moderate-to-severe radiation dermatitis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A machine learning study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning-based mortality prediction in critically ill patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated lung disease: a radiomics and clinical data integration study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Risk factors for severe radiation-induced dermatitis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Stimuli-responsive hydrogels for radiation-induced skin injury: from passive barriers to autonomous drug delivery systems.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-based automated grading and severity prediction of radiation dermatitis: a review.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Using Radiomics and Explainable Ensemble Learning to Predict Radiation Pneumonitis and Survival in NSCLC Patients Post-VMAT.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prognostic model for human immunodeficiency virus-associated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Improves Prediction of Normal-Tissue Complications Compared with Radiobiological Models in Head-and-Neck Radiotherapy: An Exploratory Small-cohort Study.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to develop an ensemble machine learning-based (EML-based) risk prediction model for radiation dermatitis (RD) in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing proton radiotherapy, with the goal of achieving superior predictive performance compared to traditional models. MATERIALS AND
methodsData from 57 head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were analyzed. The study incorporated 11 clinical and 9 dosimetric parameters. Pearson's correlation was used to eliminate highly correlated variables, followed by feature selection via LASSO to focus on potential RD predictors. Model training involved traditional logistic regression (LR) and advanced ensemble methods such as Random Forest and XGBoost, which were optimized through hyperparameter tuning.
resultsFeature selection identified six key predictors, including smoking history and specific dosimetric parameters. Ensemble machine learning models, particularly XGBoost, demonstrated superior performance, achieving the highest AUC of 0.890. Feature importance was assessed using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values, which underscored the relevance of various clinical and dosimetric factors in predicting RD.
conclusionThe study confirms that EML methods, especially XGBoost with its boosting algorithm, provide superior predictive accuracy, enhanced feature selection, and improved data handling compared to traditional LR. While LR offers greater interpretability, the precision and broader applicability of EML make it more suitable for complex medical prediction tasks, such as predicting radiation dermatitis. Given these advantages, EML is highly recommended for further research and application in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.