ArticleJournal of translational medicine2024
Siderophore-harboring gut bacteria and fecal siderophore genes for predicting the responsiveness of fecal microbiota transplantation for active ulcerative colitis.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of dietary iron deprivation and supplementation in a murine model of colitis.FASEB bioAdvances · 2025Article
- Deciphering the immunocellular regulatory network in inflammatory bowel disease: from susceptibility genes to cellular effectors and toward precision therapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPredictive markers for fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) outcomes in patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC) are poorly defined. We aimed to investigate changes in gut microbiota pre- and post-FMT and to assess the potential value in determining the total copy number of fecal bacterial siderophore genes in predicting FMT responsiveness.
methodsPatients with active UC (Mayo score ≥ 3) who had undergone two FMT procedures were enrolled. Fecal samples were collected before and 8 weeks after each FMT session. Patients were classified into clinical response and non-response groups, based on their Mayo scores. The fecal microbiota profile was accessed using metagenomic sequencing, and the total siderophore genes copy number via quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Additionally, we examined the association between the total siderophore genes copy number and FMT efficacy.
resultsSeventy patients with UC had undergone FMT. The clinical response and remission rates were 50% and 10% after the first FMT procedure, increasing to 72.41% and 27.59% after the second FMT. The cumulative clinical response and clinical remission rates were 72.86% and 25.71%. Compared with baseline, the response group showed a significant increase in Faecalibacterium, and decrease in Enterobacteriaceae, consisted with the changes of the total bacterial siderophore genes copy number after the second FMT (1889.14 vs. 98.73 copies/ng, P < 0.01). Virulence factor analysis showed an enriched iron uptake system, especially bacterial siderophores, in the pre-FMT response group, with a greater contribution from Escherichia coli. The total baseline copy number was significantly higher in the response group than non-response group (1889.14 vs. 94.86 copies/ng, P < 0.01). A total baseline copy number cutoff value of 755.88 copies/ng showed 94.7% specificity and 72.5% sensitivity in predicting FMT responsiveness.
conclusionsA significant increase in Faecalibacterium, and decrease in Enterobacteriaceae and the total fecal siderophore genes copy number were observed in responders after FMT. The siderophore genes and its encoding bacteria may be of predictive value for the clinical responsiveness of FMT to active ulcerative colitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.