Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38915016›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2024

Effect of vertical implant position on marginal bone loss: a randomized clinical trial.

Morad Hedayatipanah, Hadi Kokabi Arasteh, Abbas Shokri, Behnaz Alafchi, Leila Shahsavand Baghdadi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Morad HedayatipanahDepartment of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Hadi Kokabi ArastehDepartment of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Abbas ShokriDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Behnaz AlafchiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Leila Shahsavand BaghdadiDepartment of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. shahsavand.leila@yahoo.com.

Funding

The Vice-Chancellor of Research and Technology of the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences 1400120310162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOne of the most important factors that has influence on dental implants success rate is marginal bone loss. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the implant's vertical position and the soft tissue's thickness on the rate of marginal bone loss of the dental implant. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this single-blind randomized clinical trial study, 56 implants placed in the posterior region of mandible of 33 patients (19 women, 14 men) were divided into two groups. The group of crestal (28 implants) and subcrestal (28 implants) implants, each group was divided into two sub-groups with soft tissue thickness of 2 mm and less than 2 mm (14 implants) and more than 2 mm (14 implants). The amount of marginal bone loss was measured by Scanora 5.2 program with radiographs Digital parallelism based on the effect of the vertical position of the implant, soft tissue thickness, three months after placement, and three months after loading implants (six months after implant placement).

resultsThe results showed that marginal bone loss in subcrestal implants is significantly more than crestal implants (p-value = 0.001), and also marginal bone loss in the soft tissue thickness group of 2 mm and less is significantly more than the group of soft tissue thickness more than 2 mm (p-value < 0.001). The amount of marginal bone loss three months after implant loading was significantly higher than three months after implant placement (p-value < 0.001).

conclusionThe implant's vertical position and the soft tissue's thickness around the implant are effective factors in the amount of marginal bone loss. Marginal bone loss is more in subcrestal implants and in cases with less soft tissue thickness. The time factor significantly affects the amount of marginal bone loss.

trial registrationthis clinical trial was registered at Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, registration number IRCT20120215009014N415, registration date 20,220,110, (https//en.irct.ir/trial/60,991).

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossDental ImplantsAdultDental Implantation, EndosseousFemaleHumansMaleMandibleMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodDental ImplantsMarginal bone lossSoft tissue thicknessVertical implant position

Identifiers

PMID38915016
PMCPMC11197272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.