Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38915008›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Development of a quantitative index system for evaluating the quality of electronic medical records in disease risk intelligent prediction.

Jiayin Zhou, Jie Hao, Mingkun Tang, Haixia Sun, Jiayang Wang, Jiao Li, Qing Qian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiayin Zhou *Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jie Hao *Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Mingkun TangInstitute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Haixia SunInstitute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jiayang WangChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jiao LiInstitute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Qing QianInstitute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China. qing_qian@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate a quantitative index system for evaluating the data quality of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) in disease risk prediction using Machine Learning (ML). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe index system was developed in four steps: (1) a preliminary index system was outlined based on literature review; (2) we utilized the Delphi method to structure the indicators at all levels; (3) the weights of these indicators were determined using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method; and (4) the developed index system was empirically validated using real-world EMR data in a ML-based disease risk prediction task.

resultsThe synthesis of review findings and the expert consultations led to the formulation of a three-level index system with four first-level, 11 second-level, and 33 third-level indicators. The weights of these indicators were obtained through the AHP method. Results from the empirical analysis illustrated a positive relationship between the scores assigned by the proposed index system and the predictive performances of the datasets. DISCUSSION: The proposed index system for evaluating EMR data quality is grounded in extensive literature analysis and expert consultation. Moreover, the system's high reliability and suitability has been affirmed through empirical validation.

conclusionThe novel index system offers a robust framework for assessing the quality and suitability of EMR data in ML-based disease risk predictions. It can serve as a guide in building EMR databases, improving EMR data quality control, and generating reliable real-world evidence.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyElectronic Health RecordsMachine LearningDelphi TechniqueHumansRisk AssessmentData managementDisease risk predictionElectronic medical recordMachine learningQuality control

Identifiers

PMID38915008
PMCPMC11194906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.