Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38915006›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2024

Strategies, processes, outcomes, and costs of implementing experience sampling-based monitoring in routine mental health care in four European countries: study protocol for the IMMERSE effectiveness-implementation study.

Ulrich Reininghaus, Matthias Schwannauer, Islay Barne, Joanne R Beames, Rafaël A Bonnier, Manuel Brenner, Dagmar Breznoščáková, Daniel Dančík, Manuela De Allegri, Simona Di Folco and 22 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Ulrich Reininghaus *Department of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany. ulrich.reininghaus@zi-mannheim.de.
Matthias Schwannauer *School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Islay BarneSchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Joanne R BeamesCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Rafaël A BonnierCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Manuel BrennerHector Institute for AI in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Dagmar BreznoščákováCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Daniel DančíkDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Manuela De AllegriHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Simona Di FolcoSchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Daniel DurstewitzHector Institute for AI in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Jessica GugelDepartment of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Michal HajdúkDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Anton HeretikDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Ľubomíra IzákováDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Zuzana KatreniakovaDepartment of Social and Behavioural Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia.
Glenn KiekensCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Georgia KoppeHector Institute for AI in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Adam KurillaDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Luca MarelliCentre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Iveta NagyovaDepartment of Social and Behavioural Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia.
Hoa NguyenHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ján PečeňákDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Julia C C Schulte-StrathausDepartment of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Koraima Sotomayor-EnriquezSchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Lotte UyttebroekCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jeroen WeermeijerCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Maria WoltersDepartment of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Michel WensingDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan R BoehnkeDepartment of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Inez Myin-Germeys *Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anita Schick *Department of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja APVV-22-0587DFG 389624707Horizon 2020 945263Marie Skłodowska-Curie fellowship 101063326Research Foundation Flanders 1204924N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent years have seen a growing interest in the use of digital tools for delivering person-centred mental health care. Experience Sampling Methodology (ESM), a structured diary technique for capturing moment-to-moment variation in experience and behaviour in service users' daily life, reflects a particularly promising avenue for implementing a person-centred approach. While there is evidence on the effectiveness of ESM-based monitoring, uptake in routine mental health care remains limited. The overarching aim of this hybrid effectiveness-implementation study is to investigate, in detail, reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance as well as contextual factors, processes, and costs of implementing ESM-based monitoring, reporting, and feedback into routine mental health care in four European countries (i.e., Belgium, Germany, Scotland, Slovakia).

methodsIn this hybrid effectiveness-implementation study, a parallel-group, assessor-blind, multi-centre cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) will be conducted, combined with a process and economic evaluation. In the cRCT, 24 clinical units (as the cluster and unit of randomization) at eight sites in four European countries will be randomly allocated using an unbalanced 2:1 ratio to one of two conditions: (a) the experimental condition, in which participants receive a Digital Mobile Mental Health intervention (DMMH) and other implementation strategies in addition to treatment as usual (TAU) or (b) the control condition, in which service users are provided with TAU. Outcome data in service users and clinicians will be collected at four time points: at baseline (t DISCUSSION: If this trial provides evidence on reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of implementing ESM-based monitoring, reporting, and feedback, it will form the basis for establishing its public health impact and has significant potential to bridge the research-to-practice gap and contribute to swifter ecological translation of digital innovations to real-world delivery in routine mental health care.

trial registrationISRCTN15109760 (ISRCTN registry, date: 03/08/2022).

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBelgiumCost-Benefit AnalysisEcological Momentary AssessmentEuropeGermanyHumansMental DisordersSlovakiaEcological Momentary AssessmentExperience Sampling MethodmHealth

Identifiers

PMID38915006
PMCPMC11194943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.