ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2024
Barriers to conservative kidney management for Japanese healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of end-stage renal disease.
Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-specific trends in peritoneal dialysis use among incident dialysis patients in Japan.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Article
- Recent trends in dialysis initiation in Japan: a region‑specific descriptive analysis using Hokkaido as an example.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConservative kidney management (CKM) is a treatment alternative for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Despite the increasing population of elderly dialysis patients in Japan, CKM is not as readily available compared with that in North America and Europe. Therefore, it is important to clarify the barriers to CKM in Japan.
methodsWe interviewed 11 experts to explore their beliefs and issues regarding CKM. Based on the interviews, we categorized the CKM barriers into eight categories and created a 24-item questionnaire. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 112 medical professionals involved in ESKD management. To investigate the types of barriers, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis using the questionnaire results.
resultsResponses were obtained from 53 (47.3%) of 112 subjects (18 doctors, 29 nurses, 6 clinical engineers), with 94.3% considering CKM as a treatment option for ESKD. Factor analysis categorized the questions into the following: (1) Lack of palliative care experience, (2) Ethics and responsibility, (3) Patient's problem, (4) Dialog with patients and families, and (5) Lack of support system. Regarding barriers to CKM, "lack of experience in palliative care" and "lack of support system" scored the highest, and "ethics and responsibility" scored the lowest.
conclusionsBarriers to CKM may be classified into five factors, with "lack of experience in palliative care" and "lack of support system" being the important barriers to overcome. Additionally, most healthcare professionals consider CKM as the fourth option for renal replacement therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38914911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.