ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2025
Schizophrenia and risk preference: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing evidence shows that risk preference is associated with schizophrenia. However, the causality and direction of this association are not clear; Therefore, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) to examine the potential bidirectional relationship between risk preference and schizophrenia. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data on risk preference of 939,908 participants from the UK Biobank and 23andMe were used to identify general risk preference. Data from 320,404 subjects (76,755 cases and 243,649 controls) from The Psychiatric Genomics Consortium were used to identify schizophrenia. The weighted median (WM), the inverse variance weighted (IVW), and the Mendelian randomization-Egger (MR-Egger) methods were used for the MR analysis to estimate the causal effect and detect the directional pleiotropy. The GWAS summary data were respectively from two combined samples, containing 939,908 and 320,404 subjects of European ancestry. Mendelian randomization evidence suggested that risk preference was associated with increased onset of schizophrenia (OR = 2.84, 95CI%: 1.77-4.56, P = 1.58*10 - 5) and that schizophrenia was also associated with raised risk preference (OR = 1.11, 95CI%: 1.07-1.15, P = 7.98*10 - 8). With the use of large-scale GWAS data, robust evidence suggests an interaction between risk preference and schizophrenia. This also indicates that early identification of and intervention for increased risk preference may improve the prognosis of schizophrenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38914854What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.