Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38914821›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Integrative machine learning and neural networks for identifying PANoptosis-related lncRNA molecular subtypes and constructing a predictive model for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Zhenzhen Wang, Lixin Cheng, Juntao Huang, Yi Shen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhenzhen WangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Lixin ChengDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Juntao HuangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China. 798749265@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0206-9365
Yi ShenCentre for Medical Research, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China. tyzdhs@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81670920Ningbo Natural Science Foundation 2022J260Ningbo Public Science Research Foundation 2021S170Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Science Research Foundation 2020KY274Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Science Research Foundation 2022KY1086Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation LY23H130001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePANoptosis is considered a novel type of cell death that plays important roles in tumor progression. In this study, we applied machine learning algorithms to explore the relationships between PANoptosis-related lncRNAs (PRLs) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and established a neural network model for prognostic prediction.

methodsInformation about the HNSCC cohort was downloaded from the TCGA database, and the differentially expressed prognostic PRLs between tumor and normal samples were assessed in patients with different tumor subtypes via nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) analysis. Subsequently, five kinds of machine-learning algorithms were used to select the core PRLs across the subtypes, and the interactive features were pooled into a neural network model to establish a PRL-related risk score (PLRS) system. Survival differences were compared via Kaplan‒Meier analysis, and the predictive effects were assessed with the areas under the ROCs. Moreover, functional enrichment analysis, immune infiltration, tumor mutation burden (TMB) and clinical therapeutic response were also conducted to further evaluate the novel predictive model.

resultsA total of 347 PRLs were identified, 225 of which were differentially expressed between tumor and normal samples. Patients were divided into two clusters via NMF analysis, in which cluster 1 had a better prognosis and more immune cells and functional infiltrates. With the application of five machine learning algorithms, we selected 13 interactive PRLs to construct the predictive model. The AUCs for the ROCs in the entire set were 0.735, 0.740 and 0.723, respectively. Patients in the low-PLRS group exhibited a better prognosis, greater immune cell enrichment, greater immune function activation, lower TMB and greater sensitivity to immunotherapy.

conclusionIn this study, we established a novel neural network prognostic model to predict survival and identify tumor subtypes in HNSCC patients. This novel assessment system is useful for prediction, providing ideas for clinical treatment.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerRNA, Long NoncodingSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMalePrognosisBiomarkers, TumorRNA, Long NoncodingHead and neck squamous cell carcinomalncRNAMachine learningPANoptosisPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.