ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024
Is trans-thyroid cartilage monitoring as good as endotracheal tube monitoring during thyroidectomy?
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether trans-thyroid cartilage nerve monitoring for thyroid surgeries is as effective and safe as endotracheal tube monitoring.
methodsFifty-one thyroidectomies (38 hemithyroidectomies and 13 total thyroidectomies, analyzed as two separate hemi-thyroidectomies) were included. Patients undergoing surgery from 6/2020 to 8/2021 were monitored simultaneously with the NIM® Nerve Monitoring System TriVantage™ Electromyography (EMG) endotracheal tube and EMG trans-thyroid cartilage. Electrophysiological responses of 64 vagus and recurrent laryngeal nerves were obtained. Peri-operative evaluation and 12-month post-operative follow-up were conducted to examine nerve function. Wilcoxon signed-rank and Spearman coefficient tests were used to determine whether there were differences between the methods.
resultsThe average initial amplitude measured with the trans-thyroid cartilage method was higher in the recurrent laryngeal and vagus nerves (p = 0.002, p = 0.003, respectively). The mean difference in EMG amplitude from start to end of surgery for 10 damaged nerves (7 temporary and 3 permanent) differed from intact nerves in both methods and nerves (p < 0.05 for all). Among intact recurrent laryngeal nerves, 20.4% had 20-80% decrease in amplitude in endotracheal tube electrodes and 16.7% in trans-thyroid cartilage electrodes (p = 0.92). All cases with stable EMG signals or with increased EMG amplitude (with both types of electrodes and with both nerves) had normal post-operative vocal function. No significant difference was found between the two methods when measuring the vagus and recurrent laryngeal nerves. No complications occurred when using trans-thyroid cartilage electrodes.
conclusionsTrans-thyroid cartilage nerve monitoring for thyroid surgeries is as effective and safe as the current standard monitoring using an endotracheal tube. During thyroid surgery, patients are monitored to avoid damaging nerves near the vocal cords. This study compared monitoring through a throat tube with the easier method of monitoring outside of the throat to see if it is as effective and safe. No major difference was found between the two methods and there were no problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38914816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.