ArticleThe Journal of antibiotics2024
Identification of novel antistaphylococcal hit compounds.
Article in The Journal of antibiotics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In Silico Approach for Antibacterial Discovery: PTML Modeling of Virtual Multi-Strain Inhibitors AgainstPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common nosocomial biofilm-forming pathogens worldwide that has developed resistance mechanisms against majority of the antibiotics. Therefore, the search of novel antistaphylococcal agents with unexploited mechanisms of action, especially with antibiofilm activity, is of great interest. Seryl-tRNA synthetase is recognized as a promising drug target for the development of antibacterials. We have carried out molecular docking of compounds with antistaphycoccal activity, which were earlier found by us using phenotypic screening, into synthetic site of S. aureus SerRS and found seven hit compounds with low inhibitory activity. Further, we have performed search of S. aureus SerRS inhibitors among compounds which were previously tested by us for inhibitory activity toward S. aureus ThrRS, that belong to the same class of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Among them six hits were identified. We have selected four compounds for antibacterial study and found that the most active compound 1-methyl-3-(1H-imidazol-1-methyl-2-yl)-5-nitro-1H-indazole has MIC values toward S. aureus multidrug-resistant clinical isolates ranging from 78.12 to 156.2 µg/ml. However, this compound precipitated during anti-biofilm study. Therefore, we used 3-[N'-(2-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzylidene)hydrazino]-6-methyl-4H-[1,2,4]triazin-5-one with better solubility (ClogS value = 2.9) among investigated compounds toward SerRS for anti-biofilm study. It was found that this compound has a significant inhibitory effect on the growth of planktonic and biofilm culture of S. aureus 25923 with MIC value of 32 µg ml
Indexed as
Identifiers
38914797What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.