ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024
Angiosarcoma: clinical outcomes and prognostic factors, a single-center analysis.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatments and outcomes of primary and metastatic spinal angiosarcoma patients: study of 29 consecutive cases.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Angiosarcoma in a soft tissue sarcoma cohort: real-world patterns and outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study sought to investigate oncological outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with angiosarcomas (AS).
methodsThis single-center, retrospective cohort study, analyzed histopathologically confirmed AS cases. Primarily diagnosed, locally recurrent and metastatic AS were included. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and local progression-free survival (LPFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimator. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to detect factors associated with OS and LPFS.
resultsIn total, 118 patients with a median follow-up of 6.6 months were included. The majority presented with localized disease (62.7%), followed by metastatic (31.4%) and locally recurrent (5.9%) disease. Seventy-four patients (62.7%) received surgery, of which 29 (39.2%) were treated with surgery only, 38 (51.4%) with surgery and perioperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy, and 7 (9.4%) with surgery, perioperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Multivariable Cox regression of OS showed a significant association with age per year (hazard ratio (HR): 1.03, p = 0.044) and metastatic disease at presentation (hazard ratio: 3.24, p = 0.015). For LPFS, age per year (HR: 1.04, p = 0.008), locally recurrent disease at presentation (HR: 5.32, p = 0.013), and metastatic disease at presentation (HR: 4.06, p = 0.009) had significant associations. Tumor size, epithelioid components, margin status, and perioperative RT and/or CTX were not significantly associated with OS or LPFS.
conclusionOlder age and metastatic disease at initial presentation status were negatively associated with OS and LPFS. Innovative and collaborative effort is warranted to overcome the epidemiologic challenges of AS by collecting multi-institutional datasets, characterizing AS molecularly and identifying new perioperative therapies to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.