ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2024
The NICU tracheostomy team: multidisciplinary collaboration for improvement in survival of complex patients.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Clinical management and nursing care for patients with tracheostomy following traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEvaluate feasibility and impact of "Tracheostomy Team" on survival and length of stay (LOS) at a level IV NICU.
methodsPlan-do-study-act cycles targeted five Global Tracheostomy Collaborative "key drivers". From January 2017 to December 2022 multidisciplinary, bimonthly bedside rounds were conducted.
resultsAfter 3 cycles, in-hospital survival among 39 patients with tracheostomy improved and sustained from 67% to 100% (baseline 18/27; 66.7%; QI 35/39, 89.7%; p = 0.03). Median LOS (days [IQR]) did not significantly differ between baseline and QI (237 [57-308] vs. 217 [130-311]; p = 0.9). Among patients with BPD, median LOS was higher after QI interventions (baseline 248 [222-308] vs. QI 332.5 [283.5-392]; p = .02). Special cause variation resulted from peak increase in LOS during the COVID19 pandemic (2021). Tracheitis/pneumonia was treated significantly more frequently in QI BPD patients.
conclusionMultidisciplinary approach is feasible, resulting in improved survival without a sustained increase in LOS. Future QI efforts should address post-operative infectious complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38914748What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.