ArticleScientific reports2024
Numerical computation and experimental assessment of a pressure-retaining gas-tight sediment sampler.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The pressure of the recovered sample is intricately connected to seawater temperature, the recovery velocity, and the pressure of the pre-charged gas. To better understand the sample pressure dynamics during the sampling recovery process, we focus on a gas-tight sediment sampler, delving into its pressure-compensation and pressure-retaining mechanisms. A comprehensive thermal and thermodynamic analysis is conducted throughout the entire pressure-retaining sampling process, examining the temporal variations in the temperatures of seawater and nitrogen within the sampler at various descending velocities. The heat transfer and thermodynamics are examined throughout the entire pressure-retaining sampling process to determine how changes in the temperatures of seawater and nitrogen, as well as the descent velocity, affect the pressure-retaining performance. The influence of pre-charging pressure and recovery velocities on the pressure-retaining performance of the sampler is examined. Then the proposed numerical model was well verified by the ultra-high-pressure vessel experiments of the sampler under 115 MPa. Finally, the sea trial results further verified the accuracy of the numerical model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.