ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
Walking recovery after tethered cord release.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Letter to the editor: Walking recovery after tethered cord release.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After myelomeningocele (MMC) repair, a secondary tethered spinal cord occurs in almost all patients. The tethered spinal cord may result in progressive neurological deterioration and walking disability. This retrospective cohort study aimed to highlight the walking recovery one year after tethered cord release and its relation to the preoperative conus level. We reviewed the medical records at our university hospital from January 2014 to December 2022. The patients who underwent spinal cord untethering following lumbosacral MMC repair were included. We assessed the walking recovery one year after cord release using the modified Benzel scale. Thirty-seven patients met our selection criteria. There were 19 girls (51.4%) and 18 boys (48.6%). Their mean age at presentation was 8.6 years. The preoperative conus vertebral levels ranged between L4 and S3. One year after spinal cord release, 37.8% of the patients regained their walking ability. All the patients whose preoperative conus level was at S2 or S3 regained their walking ability. In contrast, all the patients with preoperative conus levels at L4 or L5 didn't regain their ability to walk. One-third (33.3%) of patients whose conus was at the S1 level regained their walking ability one year after cord release. One year after tethered cord release, 37.8% of the patients regained their walking ability. We found that the walking recovery was statistically associated with the preoperative conus level. A multicenter prospective study is required to support the results of this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.