Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38914693›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2024

Walking recovery after tethered cord release.

Mohamed Ar AbdelFatah, Aly Ibrahim, Sameh Hefny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamed Ar AbdelFatahNeurosurgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. mohamed_abdelrahman@med.asu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3432-0988
Aly IbrahimNeurosurgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Sameh HefnyNeurosurgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After myelomeningocele (MMC) repair, a secondary tethered spinal cord occurs in almost all patients. The tethered spinal cord may result in progressive neurological deterioration and walking disability. This retrospective cohort study aimed to highlight the walking recovery one year after tethered cord release and its relation to the preoperative conus level. We reviewed the medical records at our university hospital from January 2014 to December 2022. The patients who underwent spinal cord untethering following lumbosacral MMC repair were included. We assessed the walking recovery one year after cord release using the modified Benzel scale. Thirty-seven patients met our selection criteria. There were 19 girls (51.4%) and 18 boys (48.6%). Their mean age at presentation was 8.6 years. The preoperative conus vertebral levels ranged between L4 and S3. One year after spinal cord release, 37.8% of the patients regained their walking ability. All the patients whose preoperative conus level was at S2 or S3 regained their walking ability. In contrast, all the patients with preoperative conus levels at L4 or L5 didn't regain their ability to walk. One-third (33.3%) of patients whose conus was at the S1 level regained their walking ability one year after cord release. One year after tethered cord release, 37.8% of the patients regained their walking ability. We found that the walking recovery was statistically associated with the preoperative conus level. A multicenter prospective study is required to support the results of this study.

Indexed as

Neural Tube DefectsRecovery of FunctionWalkingAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMeningomyeloceleNeurosurgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeMyelomeningoceleSpinal cord releaseTethered cordUntetheringWalking recovery

Identifiers

PMID38914693
PMCPMC11196356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.