Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38914667›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Fluorescence-based reagent and spectrum-based optical reader for lactoferrin detection in tears: differentiating Sjögren's syndrome from non-Sjögren's dry eye syndrome.

Chia-Ying Tsai, Chitsung Hong, Min-Yen Hsu, Tso-Ting Lai, Ching-Wen Huang, Cheng-Yo Lu, Wei-Li Chen, Chao-Min Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Diagnostic methods for managing dry eyes.World journal of methodology · 2025
    Article
  3. Exploring TbThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Translating Biomarker Discovery: From Bench to Bedside in Dry Eye Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chia-Ying TsaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chitsung HongSpectroChip Inc., Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Min-Yen HsuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Tso-Ting LaiGraduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ching-Wen HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Rd, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Cheng-Yo LuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Wei-Li Chen *Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Rd, Taipei, 100, Taiwan. chenweili@ntu.edu.tw.
Chao-Min Cheng *Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, No. 101, Sec. 2, Guangfu Rd., East Dist., Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan. chaomin@mx.nthu.edu.tw.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 108-2622-E-007-020-CC3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 111-2221-E-030-015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of an early biomarker and effective testing device to differentiate dry eye disease secondary to autoimmune disease (Sjögren's syndrome dry eye disease) from non-Sjögren's dry eye disease are prerequisites for appropriate treatment. We aimed to demonstrate the capacity of a new photo-detection device to evaluate tear lactoferrin levels as a tool for differentiating systemic conditions associated with dry eye disease. Patients with non-Sjögren's and Sjögren's syndrome dry eye disease (n = 54 and n = 52, respectively) and controls (n = 11) were enrolled. All participants completed the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire. Tear collection was performed with Schirmer test, and tear break-up time was examined using a slit lamp. Tear lactoferrin was evaluated using our newly developed photo-detection device. The average lactoferrin concentration was significantly lower in samples from patients with non-Sjögren's dry eye disease (0.337 ± 0.227 mg/mL, n = 54) and Sjögren's syndrome dry eye disease (0.087 ± 0.010 mg/mL, n = 52) than in control samples (1.272 ± 0.54 mg/mL, n = 11) (p < 0.0001). Further, lactoferrin levels were lower in patients with Sjögren's syndrome dry eye disease than in those with non-Sjögren's dry eye disease (p < 0.001). Our cost-effective, antibody-free, highly sensitive photo-detection device for evaluating tear lactoferrin levels can assist ophthalmologists in differentiating different types of dry eye diseases.

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesLactoferrinSjogren's SyndromeTearsAdultAgedBiomarkersDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFluorescenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersLactoferrin

Identifiers

PMID38914667
PMCPMC11196714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.