Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38914622›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Clinical experience with shear wave elastography (SWE) for assessing healthy uterus in a transabdominal approach.

Judith M Stader, Florian Recker, Tolga Tonguc, Olga Ramig, Marcus Thudium, Dieter Matlac, Nikola Mutschler, Eva K Egger, Alexander Mustea, Jim Küppers and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Judith M Stader *Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Florian Recker *Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Tolga TongucDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Olga RamigDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Marcus ThudiumDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Dieter MatlacDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Nikola MutschlerDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Eva K EggerDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Alexander MusteaDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jim KüppersDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Markus EsslerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Jürgen JenneFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.
Holger M StrunkMedical Center, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Rupert Conrad *Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany.
Milka Marinova *Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany. milka.marinova@ukbonn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance and feasibility of transabdominal ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) in assessing sonoelastographic features of the uterus. Twenty-seven premenopausal women were enrolled between 2021 and 2022. Transabdominal SWE measured myometrial stiffness in various uterine segments. Additionally, tissue stiffness of the quadriceps femoris muscle and autochthonous back muscle was measured. Statistical analysis employed non-parametric tests, t test, and a robust mixed linear model. Stiffness values of the uterus and the two investigated muscle types exhibited a similar spectrum: 6.38 ± 2.59 kPa (median 5.61 kPa; range 2.76-11.31 kPa) for the uterine myometrium, 7.22 ± 1.24 kPa (6.82 kPa; 5.11-9.39 kPa) for the quadriceps femoris musle, and 7.43 ± 2.73 kPa (7.41 kPa; 3.10-13.73 kPa) for the autochthonous back muscle. A tendency for significant differences in myometrial stiffness was observed concerning the type of labor mode (mean stiffness of 9.17 ± 1.35 kPa after vaginal birth vs. 3.83 ± 1.35 kPa after Caesarian section, p = 0.01). No significant differences in myometrial stiffness were observed concerning age, BMI, previous pregnancies, uterine flexion and menstrual cycle phase. Transabdominal SWE of uterine stiffness seems to be a fast and practicable method in a clinical setting. Uterine stiffness appears to be largely independent of various factors, except for the mode of delivery. However, further studies are needed to validate these results.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesUterusAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMyometriumPregnancyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38914622
PMCPMC11196258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.