Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38914481›Full record

Trial reportHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2024

Evaluating the safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for rectal endometriosis: results from a French prospective multicentre study including 60 patients.

G Dubernard, E Maissiat, G Legendre, T Dennis, P Capmas, S Warembourg, P Descamps, F Chavrier, H Roman, H Fernandez and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04494568 (Evaluation of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04494568 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) in the Treatment of Rectal Endometriosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorEDAP TMS S.A.Ran2020 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsEndometriosis, RectumArmsHIFU treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

G DubernardDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3455-9908
E MaissiatDepartment of Radiology, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Lyon, France.
G LegendreDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
T DennisDepartment of Gynaecology, Tivoli-Ducos Clinic, Bordeaux, France.
P CapmasDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Kremlin-Bicêtre University Hospital, Paris, France.
S WarembourgDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France.
P DescampsDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
F ChavrierLaboratory of Therapeutic Applications of Ultrasound, Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France.
H RomanDepartment of Gynaecology, Tivoli-Ducos Clinic, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9237-0628
H FernandezDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Kremlin-Bicêtre University Hospital, Paris, France.
E Nguyen-BaDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France.
B MerlotDepartment of Gynaecology, Tivoli-Ducos Clinic, Bordeaux, France.
P RoussetDepartment of Radiology, South Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France.
C LafonLaboratory of Therapeutic Applications of Ultrasound, Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France.
Charles-André PhilipDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France.

Funding

EDAP TMS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionIs increasing the intensity of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) by 30% in the treatment of rectal endometriosis a safe procedure? SUMMARY ANSWER: This study demonstrates the safety of a 30% increase in the intensity of HIFU in the treatment of rectal endometriosis, with no Clavien-Dindo Grade III complications overall, and namely no rectovaginal fistulae. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A feasibility study including 20 patients with rectal endometriosis demonstrated, with no severe complications, a significant improvement in digestive disorders, dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, and health status, although the volume of the endometriosis nodule did not appear to be reduced. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A prospective multicentre cohort study was conducted between 2020 and 2022 with 60 patients with symptomatic rectal endometriosis. Following the failure of medical treatment, HIFU treatment was offered as an alternative to surgery. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsAs the main objective of this study was to examine safety, all adverse events observed during the 6 months of follow-up were analysed and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and Clavien-Dindo classifications. Secondary objectives included evaluating the evolution of symptoms using validated questionnaires: gynaecological and digestive pain symptoms with a visual analogue scale, health status with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire, average post-operative daily pain level, and analgesic medication required in the 10 days following treatment. MRI was also performed at Day 1 to detect early complications. Finally, we performed a blinded MRI review of the evolution of the nodule at 6 months post-treatment. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The procedure was performed under spinal anaesthesia for 30% of the patients. The median duration of treatment was 32 min. Fifty-five patients left the hospital on Day 1. MRI scans performed on Day 1 did not highlight any early-onset post-operative complication. Using the Clavien-Dindo classification, we listed 56.7% Grade I events, 3.4% Grade II events, and no events Grade III or higher. At 1, 3, and 6 months, all gynaecologic, digestive and general symptoms, as well as health status, had significantly improved. The evolution of the nodule was also significant (P < 0.001) with a 28% decrease in volume. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The main objective was safety and not effectiveness. The study was not randomized and there was no control group. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsHIFU treatment for rectal endometriosis results in an improvement of symptoms with low morbidity; as such, for selected patients, it could be a valuable alternative to surgical approaches following the failure of medical treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was funded by the company EDAP TMS. Professors Dubernard and Rousset are consultants for EDAP TMS. Dubernard received travel support from EDAP-TMS. Dr F. Chavrier received industrial grants from EDAP-TMS. He has developed a device for generating focused ultrasonic waves with reduced treatment time. This device has been patented by EDAP-TMS. Dr Lafon received industrial grants from EDAP-TMS; he declares that EDAP-TMS provided funding directly to INSERM to support a young researcher chair in therapeutic ultrasound, which is unrelated to the current study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04494568.

Indexed as

EndometriosisRectal DiseasesAdultDysmenorrheaDyspareuniaFemaleFranceHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment Outcomedeep infiltrating endometriosisgastrointestinal symptomsgynaecological symptomshealth statushigh-intensity focused ultrasoundMedical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Formrectal endometriosissafety

Identifiers

PMID38914481
PMCPMC11291952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.