ArticleACS nano2024
Characterization of Mass, Diameter, Density, and Surface Properties of Colloidal Nanoparticles Enabled by Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.
Article in ACS nano, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantification of Intact MDa Poly(A)-Tailed and Non-Tailed mRNA Fractions with Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Contact Electrification of Individual Water Microdroplets Inside Mass Spectrometers Leads to Extensive Oxidation or Reduction Irrespective of Initial Droplet Charge or Polarity.ACS central science · 2026Article
- Accurate Sizing and Resolution of Nominal 200 nm Diameter Polystyrene Nanospheres With Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Atmospheric Sampling Mass Spectrometers Activate and Ionize Neutral Water Microdroplets to MeV Energies and up to 200,000+ Charges: Implications for Water Stability and Unusual Chemistry in Microdroplets.ACS central science · 2025Article
- Adeno-associated virus serotype 9 structural heterogeneity and stability characterized by charge detection mass spectrometry.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- Learning from Metal Nanocrystal Heterogeneity: A Need for Information-Rich and High-Throughput Single-Nanocrystal Measurements.ACS nanoscience Au · 2025Review
- Single particle charge detection mass spectrometry enables molecular characterization of lipid nanoparticles and mRNA packaging.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025Article
- Characterizing Monoclonal Antibody Aggregation Using Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry and Industry Standard Methods.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025Article
- Article
- Understanding the Formation Dynamics and Physical Properties of Nanocapsules Using Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.ACS nano · 2025Article
- High-Throughput Single-Particle Characterization of Aggregation Pathways and the Effects of Inhibitors for Large (Megadalton) Protein Oligomers.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A variety of scattering-based, microscopy-based, and mobility-based methods are frequently used to probe the size distributions of colloidal nanoparticles with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) often considered to be the "gold standard". Charge detection mass spectrometry (CDMS) is an alternative method for nanoparticle characterization that can rapidly measure the mass and charge of individual nanoparticle ions with high accuracy. Two low polydispersity, ∼100 nm diameter nanoparticle size standards with different compositions (polymethyl methacrylate/polystyrene copolymer and 100% polystyrene) were characterized using both TEM and CDMS to explore the merits and complementary aspects of both methods. Mass and diameter distributions are rapidly obtained from CDMS measurements of thousands of individual ions of known spherical shape, requiring less time than TEM sample preparation and image analysis. TEM image-to-image variations resulted in a ∼1-2 nm range in the determined mean diameters whereas the CDMS mass precision of ∼1% in these experiments leads to a diameter uncertainty of just 0.3 nm. For the 100% polystyrene nanoparticles with known density, the CDMS and TEM particle diameter distributions were in excellent agreement. For the copolymer nanoparticles with unknown density, the diameter from TEM measurements combined with the mass from CDMS measurements enabled an accurate measurement of nanoparticle density. Differing extents of charging for the two nanoparticle standards measured by CDMS show that charging is sensitive to nanoparticle surface properties. A mixture of the two samples was separated based on their different extents of charging despite having overlapping mass distributions centered at 341.5 and 331.0 MDa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.