Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38913890›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

The neuron as a direct data-driven controller.

Jason J Moore, Alexander Genkin, Magnus Tournoy, Joshua L Pughe-Sanford, Rob R de Ruyter van Steveninck, Dmitri B Chklovskii

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neural rhythms as priors of speech computations.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Machine learning meets physics: A two-way street.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jason J MooreNeuroscience Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY 10016.ORCID 0000-0002-4209-3896
Alexander GenkinCenter for Computational Neuroscience, Flatiron Institute, New York City, NY 10010.ORCID 0000-0002-0716-1304
Magnus TournoyCenter for Computational Neuroscience, Flatiron Institute, New York City, NY 10010.ORCID 0000-0001-9284-0856
Joshua L Pughe-SanfordCenter for Computational Neuroscience, Flatiron Institute, New York City, NY 10010.
Rob R de Ruyter van SteveninckPhysics Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405.ORCID 0009-0006-4165-3528
Dmitri B ChklovskiiNeuroscience Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY 10016.

Funding

Postdoctoral Research Training in Neurodegenerative Disorders and the Aging BrainT32AG052909 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Helen E Scharfman, THOMAS M WISNIEWSKI · 2017 to 2026
$2.5M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG052909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the quest to model neuronal function amid gaps in physiological data, a promising strategy is to develop a normative theory that interprets neuronal physiology as optimizing a computational objective. This study extends current normative models, which primarily optimize prediction, by conceptualizing neurons as optimal feedback controllers. We posit that neurons, especially those beyond early sensory areas, steer their environment toward a specific desired state through their output. This environment comprises both synaptically interlinked neurons and external motor sensory feedback loops, enabling neurons to evaluate the effectiveness of their control via synaptic feedback. To model neurons as biologically feasible controllers which implicitly identify loop dynamics, infer latent states, and optimize control we utilize the contemporary direct data-driven control (DD-DC) framework. Our DD-DC neuron model explains various neurophysiological phenomena: the shift from potentiation to depression in spike-timing-dependent plasticity with its asymmetry, the duration and adaptive nature of feedforward and feedback neuronal filters, the imprecision in spike generation under constant stimulation, and the characteristic operational variability and noise in the brain. Our model presents a significant departure from the traditional, feedforward, instant-response McCulloch-Pitts-Rosenblatt neuron, offering a modern, biologically informed fundamental unit for constructing neural networks.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeuronsAction PotentialsAnimalsHumansNeuronal Plasticitycontroldynamicsneuron

Identifiers

PMID38913890
PMCPMC11228465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.