Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38913857›Full record

ReviewExpert review of hematology2024

Sickle cell disease and infertility risks: implications for counseling and care of affected girls and women.

Lydia H Pecker, Katie Cameron

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The right patient, the right treatment: tailoring sickle cell disease care.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lydia H PeckerDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Katie CameronDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Clinical and genetic risk factors associated with adverse long-term health outcomes after curative therapies in individuals with sickle cell diseaseU01HL156620 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEBAUN, MICHAEL R., FITZHUGH, COURTNEY D · 2021 to 2025
$4.1M
Johns Hopkins Women's Reproductive Health Research Career Development ProgramK12HD103036 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SATIN, ANDREW J. · 2020 to 2024
$1.5M
OVARIAN RESERVE IN POST-MENARCHAL FEMALES WITH SICKLE CELL ANEMIAK23HL146841 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PECKER, LYDIA · 2020 to 2024
$1.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL146841NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL156620NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD103036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSickle cell disease (SCD), its treatments and cures present infertility risks. Fertility counseling is broadly indicated for affected girls and women and fertility preservation may appeal to some. Several streams of evidence suggest that the reproductive lifespan of women with SCD is reduced. Pregnancy is associated with high miscarriage rates. There are enduring questions about the effects of highly effective hydroxyurea treatment on female fertility. Current conditioning regimens for gene therapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplant are gonadotoxic. Fertility preservation methods exist as non-experimental standards of care for girls and women. Clinicians are challenged to overcome multifactorial barriers to incorporate fertility counseling and fertility preservation care into routine SCD care. AREAS COVERED: Here we provide a narrative review of existing evidence regarding fertility and infertility risks in girls and women with SCD and consider counseling implications of existing evidence. EXPERT OPINION: Addressing fertility for girls and women with SCD requires engaging concerns that emerge across the lifespan, acknowledging uncertainty and identifying barriers to care, some of which may be insurmountable without public policy changes. The contemporary SCD care paradigm can offer transformative SCD treatments alongside comprehensive counselling that addresses fertility risks and fertility preservation opportunities.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellCounselingFertility PreservationFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansHydroxyureaInfertilityInfertility, FemalePregnancyHydroxyureacurative therapiesfertilityinfertilitypatient counselingpregnancySickle cell disease

Identifiers

PMID38913857
PMCPMC11293988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.