ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
FastHPOCR: pragmatic, fast, and accurate concept recognition using the human phenotype ontology.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- AutoPCR: automated phenotype concept recognition by prompting.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- A foundational model encodes deep phenotyping data and enables diverse downstream applications.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- ClinPreAI: An Agentic AI System for Early Postpartum Depression Risk Prediction from Multimodal EHR Data.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A systematic analysis of mitochondrial aminoacyl tRNA synthetase variants in a rare disease cohort.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Improving automated deep phenotyping through large language models using retrieval-augmented generation.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- First steps toward building natural history of diseases computationally: Lessons learned from the Noonan syndrome use case.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- A simplified retriever to improve accuracy of phenotype normalizations by large language models.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationHuman Phenotype Ontology (HPO)-based phenotype concept recognition (CR) underpins a faster and more effective mechanism to create patient phenotype profiles or to document novel phenotype-centred knowledge statements. While the increasing adoption of large language models (LLMs) for natural language understanding has led to several LLM-based solutions, we argue that their intrinsic resource-intensive nature is not suitable for realistic management of the phenotype CR lifecycle. Consequently, we propose to go back to the basics and adopt a dictionary-based approach that enables both an immediate refresh of the ontological concepts as well as efficient re-analysis of past data.
resultsWe developed a dictionary-based approach using a pre-built large collection of clusters of morphologically equivalent tokens-to address lexical variability and a more effective CR step by reducing the entity boundary detection strictly to candidates consisting of tokens belonging to ontology concepts. Our method achieves state-of-the-art results (0.76 F1 on the GSC+ corpus) and a processing efficiency of 10 000 publication abstracts in 5 s. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: FastHPOCR is available as a Python package installable via pip. The source code is available at https://github.com/tudorgroza/fast_hpo_cr. A Java implementation of FastHPOCR will be made available as part of the Fenominal Java library available at https://github.com/monarch-initiative/fenominal. The up-to-date GCS-2024 corpus is available at https://github.com/tudorgroza/code-for-papers/tree/main/gsc-2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.