ReviewThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2024
Healthcare Resource Use Associated With Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia: A Literature Review.
Review in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical characteristics of pediatric tumor-induced osteomalacia: a systematic review and individual patient data analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Burden of Disease in Pediatric Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia: A Literature Review.Calcified tissue international · 2026Review
- Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT for phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor localization in suspected tumor-induced osteomalacia.JBMR plus · 2025Article
- Case Report with Literature Review: Tumor-induced osteomalacia from a soft-tissue phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor of the trunk.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Healthcare Resource Use Associated With Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia: A Literature Review.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextTumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) is an ultra-rare, paraneoplastic syndrome caused by tumors that secrete fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23). Initial signs and musculoskeletal symptoms can be nonspecific and unrecognized, leading to long delays in diagnosis and treatment, and resulting in severe and progressive disability in patients with TIO.
objectiveThis review aimed to identify published evidence on healthcare resource use in TIO to better understand the burden of the disease. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A targeted literature review was conducted to identify publications reporting on disease characteristics and healthcare resource use associated with TIO. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: In total, 414 publications were included in the review, of which 376 were case reports. From the case reports, data on 621 patients were extracted. These patients had a mean (SD) age of 46.3 (15.8) years; 57.6% were male. Mean time from first symptoms to diagnosis of TIO was 4.6 (4.7) years and, in cases where imaging tests were reported, patients underwent a mean of 4.1 (2.7) procedures. Tumor resection was attempted in 81.0% of patients and successful in 67.0%. Fracture was reported in 49.3% of patients. Results from association analyses demonstrated that longer time to diagnosis was associated with poorer tumor resection outcomes and a higher probability of tumor recurrence. Unfavorable tumor resection outcomes were associated with greater use of pharmacologic treatment and a greater likelihood of orthopedic surgery.
conclusionTIO is associated with a substantial healthcare resource burden. Improvements in the diagnostic process could lead to better management of TIO, thereby benefiting patients and reducing that burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.