ArticlePloS one2024
Copy number variant detection using next-generation sequencing in EYS-associated retinitis pigmentosa.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Molecular Diagnostic Accuracy in Genetic Eye Disorders Through a Personalized Re-Evaluation Strategy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- A Novel Technique for Validating Copy Number Variants and Its Application in Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy.Human mutation · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics of EYS-associated retinal dystrophy in 291 Japanese patients.NPJ genomic medicine · 2025Article
- Development of Macular Atrophy after Macular Hole Surgery in an Eye with Retinitis Pigmentosa.Case reports in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is the most common inherited retinal dystrophy and a major cause of blindness. RP is caused by several variants of multiple genes, and genetic diagnosis by identifying these variants is important for optimizing treatment and estimating patient prognosis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), which is currently widely used for diagnosis, is considered useful but is known to have limitations in detecting copy number variations (CNVs). In this study, we re-evaluated CNVs in EYS, the main causative gene of RP, identified via NGS using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). CNVs were identified in NGS samples of eight patients. To identify potential CNVs, MLPA was also performed on samples from 42 patients who were undiagnosed by NGS but carried one of the five major pathogenic variants reported in Japanese EYS-RP cases. All suspected CNVs based on NGS data in the eight patients were confirmed via MLPA. CNVs were found in 2 of the 42 NGS-undiagnosed RP cases. Furthermore, results showed that 121 of the 661 patients with RP had EYS as the causative gene, and 8.3% (10/121 patients with EYS-RP) had CNVs. Although NGS using the CNV calling criteria utilized in this study failed to identify CNVs in two cases, no false-positive results were detected. Collectively, these findings suggest that NGS is useful for CNV detection during clinical diagnosis of RP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.