Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38913600›Full record

ReviewExpert review of medical devices2024

Is conduction system pacing a panacea for pacemaker therapy?

Stephe Kamalathasan, Maria Paton, John Gierula, Sam Straw, Klaus K Witte

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of medical devices, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Left ventricular electrode placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephe KamalathasanCardiology Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Maria PatonCardiology Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
John GierulaLeeds Institute of Cardiometabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Sam StrawLeeds Institute of Cardiometabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Klaus K WitteLeeds Institute of Cardiometabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7146-7105

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile supported by robust evidence and decades of clinical experience, right ventricular apical pacing for bradycardia is associated with a risk of progressive left ventricular dysfunction. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction can result in limited electrical resynchronization due to anatomical constraints and epicardial stimulation. In both settings, directly stimulating the conduction system below the atrio-ventricular node (either the bundle of His or the left bundle branch area) has potential to overcome these limitations. Conduction system pacing has met with considerable enthusiasm in view of the more physiological electrical conduction pattern, is rapidly becoming the preferred option of pacing for bradycardia, and is gaining momentum as an alternative to conventional biventricular pacing. AREAS COVERED: This article provides a review of the current efficacy and safety data for both people requiring treatment for bradycardia and the management of heart failure with conduction delay and discusses the possible future roles for conduction system pacing in routine clinical practice. EXPERT OPINION: Conduction system pacing might be the holy grail of pacemaker therapy without the disadvantages of current approaches. However, hypothesis and enthusiasm are no match for robust data, demonstrating at least equivalent efficacy and safety to standard approaches.

Indexed as

Heart Conduction SystemPacemaker, ArtificialBradycardiaCardiac Pacing, ArtificialCardiac Resynchronization TherapyHeart FailureHumansbradycardiacardiac resynchronizationConduction system pacingheart failureHis-bundle pacingleft bundle branch area pacingtherapy

Identifiers

PMID38913600
PMCPMC11346388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.