Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38913570›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024

Molecular Dating of the Teleost Whole Genome Duplication (3R) Is Compatible With the Expectations of Delayed Rediploidization.

Minbo Qi, James Clark, Edmund R R Moody, Davide Pisani, Philip C J Donoghue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Minbo QiBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5729-1820
James ClarkBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2896-1631
Edmund R R MoodyBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8785-5006
Davide PisaniBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0949-6682
Philip C J DonoghueBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3116-7463

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T012773/1China Scholarship CouncilJohn Templeton Foundation JTF 62220Leverhulme Trust RF-2022-167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate evolution has been punctuated by three whole genome duplication events that have been implicated causally in phenotypic evolution, from the origin of phenotypic novelties to explosive diversification. Arguably, the most dramatic of these is the 3R whole genome duplication event associated with the origin of teleost fishes which comprise more than half of all living vertebrate species. However, tests of a causal relationship between whole genome duplication and teleost diversification have proven difficult due to the challenge of establishing the timing of these phenomena. Here we show, based on molecular clock dating of concatenated gene alignments, that the 3R whole genome duplication event occurred in the early-middle Permian (286.18 to 267.20 million years ago; Ma), 52.02 to 12.84 million years (Myr) before the divergence of crown-teleosts in the latest Permian-earliest Late Triassic (254.36 to 234.16 Ma) and long before the major pulses of teleost diversification in Ostariophysi and Percomorpha (56.37 to 100.17 Myr and at least 139.24 to 183.29 Myr later, respectively). The extent of this temporal gap between putative cause and effect precludes 3R as a deterministic driver of teleost diversification. However, these age constraints remain compatible with the expectations of a prolonged rediploidization process following whole genome duplication which, through the effects of chromosome rearrangement and gene loss, remains a viable mechanism to explain the evolution of teleost novelties and diversification.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularFishesGene DuplicationGenomePhylogenyAnimalsdelayed rediploidizationmolecular clock datingteleost diversificationwhole genome duplication

Identifiers

PMID38913570
PMCPMC11259977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.