Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38913311›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

FISH-Banding for Characterization of Simple and Complex Chromosomal Rearrangements in Cancer.

Thomas Liehr

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas LiehrJena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Jena, Germany. Thomas.Liehr@med.uni-jena.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While interphase and metaphase-directed molecular cytogenetics is a standard technique in routine tumor (cyto)genetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization-based banding (FISH-banding) approaches are less commonly applied. In research FISH-banding showed its excellence in the characterization of simple and complex chromosomal aberrations; however, in routine settings, it is still only little applied. The main argument against FISH-banding is, that it shall be associated with comparatively high costs. However, if applied advisedly FISH-banding can even save costs, as in one or two chromosome-specific FISH experiments; otherwise, cryptic, not resolvable chromosomal rearrangements may be resolved quickly. Here the protocol for the only yet commercially available FISH-banding approach-the multicolor banding (MCB/ mBAND)-is outlined.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsChromosome BandingIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceNeoplasmsHumansComplex chromosomal rearrangementsFISH-bandingThe multicolor banding (MCB/mBAND)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.