ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
Chromosome Bandings and Recognition.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and Genetic Analysis of Pediatric Neurodevelopmental Disorders With Complex Chromosomal Rearrangements in Two Cases.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2026Article
- Genome-wide copy number profiling enhances risk stratification in multiple myeloma by shallow whole-genome sequencing.Blood advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromosome banding can be defined as the lengthwise variation in staining properties along a chromosome stained with a dye. Chromosome banding became more practical in the early 1970s and is an essential technique used in karyotyping to identify human chromosomes for both clinical and research purposes. Most importantly, karyotyping is now considered a mandatory investigation of all newly diagnosed leukemias. Some banding methods, such as Giemsa (G)-, reverse (R)-, and centromere (C)-banding, still contribute greatly by being used as a routine procedure in clinical cytogenetic laboratory nowadays. Each chromosome has a unique sequence of bar code-like stripes, allowing the identification of individual homologues and the recognition of structural abnormalities through analyzing the disruption of the normal banding pattern at specific landmarks, regions, and bands as described in the ideogram. Since the quality of metaphases obtained from malignant cells is generally inferior to normal constitutional cells for karyotyping, a practical and accurate chromosome identification training guide is indispensable for a trainee or newly employed cytogenetic technologist in a cancer cytogenetic laboratory. The most common and currently used banding methods and chromosome recognition guide for distinguishable bands of each chromosome are described in detail in this chapter with an aim to facilitate quick and accurate karyotyping in cancer cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38913307What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.