Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38913305›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Optical Genome Mapping: A Machine-Based Platform in Cytogenomics.

Jing Christine Ye, Guilin Tang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jing Christine YeDepartment of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. JCYe@mdanderson.org.
Guilin TangDepartment of Hematopathology, Division of Pathology-Lab Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical genome mapping (OGM) has generated excitement following decades of research and development. Now, commercially available technical platforms have been used to compare various other cytogenetic and cytogenomic technologies, including karyotype, microarrays, and DNA sequencing, with impressive results. In this chapter, using OGM as a case study, we advocate for a new trend in future cytogenomics, emphasizing the power of machine automation to deliver higher-quality cytogenomic data. By briefly discussing OGM, along with its major advantages and limitations, we underscore the importance of karyotype-based genomic research, from both a theoretical framework and a new technology perspective. We also call for the encouragement of further technological platform development for the future of cytogenetics and cytogenomics.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenomicsHumansAutomationChromosome instabilityCytogenetic and cytogenomic technologiesGenome architecture theoryGenome chaosKaryotype coding

Identifiers

PMID38913305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.