ArticleJournal of nephrology2024
Impact of pruritus in patients undergoing hemodialysis in Italy: a patient-based survey.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Difelikefalin for CKD-aP: real world evidence of efficacy and safety in Italian patients.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- The efficacy and safety of kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonists in patients with uraemic pruritus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundItching is an annoying symptom which afflicts patients with chronic renal failure. We aimed to assess the impact and patient's perception and experience of itching in the dialysis population in Italy.
methodsA questionnaire was developed by the National Hemodialysis and Dialysis Association of Italy (ANED) and administered to 996 hemodialysis recipients across 153 Italian dialysis centers. The main outcomes investigated by the questionnaire were patients' satisfaction on answers regarding the nature of itching; continuing to talk about itching with the nephrologist; beliefs about resolution of itching.
resultsA total of 1903 patients from 153 centers responded to the questionnaire. Patients who responded had a mean age of 67.9 ± 13.8 years (63.9% male) and were stratified by itch discomfort graded as mild (35.9%), moderate (29.6%), and severe (34.4%). Severe itching disrupted patients' daily lives, strained their relationships, caused anxiety, and diminished their quality of life. Patients with severe itch were more likely to talk about it with dialysis staff and to undertake dermatological visits. However, only 18.0% of patients reporting severe itching found the clinicians' responses satisfactory, compared to 49.1% of mild itch patients. Those who continued talking to nephrologists about itching received more satisfactory response. However, 40.8% believed itching could not be alleviated and were less likely to discuss it with nephrologists.
conclusionsThere is an intricate relationship between the severity of itching, patient perceptions, and healthcare communication among hemodialysis patients. A substantial proportion of patients experiencing severe itching expressed feelings of resignation, highlighting the pressing need for enhanced clinician-patient communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.