ReviewInternational journal of clinical oncology2025
Immunotherapy for endometrial cancer.
Review in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Global research trends and focus on immunotherapy for endometrial cancer: a comprehensive bibliometric insight and visualization analysis (2012-2024).Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Research progress of probiotics intervention on reconstruction of intestinal flora and improvement of quality of life in patients after endometrial cancer surgery.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- MRI-based radiomics interpretable model predicts microsatellite instability status in endometrioid adenocarcinoma.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Integrative machine learning and multi-omics analysis reveals ATIC as a promoter of hepatocellular carcinoma progression.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Biomaterial-enabled multimodal therapy for endometrial cancer: Subtype-guided immuno-metabolic modulation and fertility-conscious regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Association of the CXCL-ACKR1 Signaling Axis with the Angiogenic Microenvironment in Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Natural killer cells at the interface of tumor immune escape and immunotherapy resistance in endometrial cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Diabetes, Obesity, and Endometrial Cancer: A Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Assessment of the PD-1/PD-L1/PD-L2 Immune Checkpoints Pathway in Endometrial Cancer and Its Clinical Significance.Cancers · 2025Article
- Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ASGO) 2024 Annual Meeting in Bali, Indonesia.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2025Article
- Biomarkers and immunotherapy in endometrial cancer: mechanisms and clinical applications.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- The molecular classification ushers in a new era for the treatment of advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- Therapeutic Prospects of Abemaciclib for Patients with Endometrial Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- From Bench to Bedside in Emerging Therapies for Gynecological Malignancies: A Narrative Review.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) has a poor prognosis and new treatment options are needed. In 2013, EC was classified by genomic analysis into four groups: the POLE ultra-mutated group, the MSI-high hypermutated group (MSI-H), the copy number low group, and the copy number high group. The prognosis differs based on the classification, which should enable the individualization of treatment. The MSI-H and POLE types can induce PD-L1 expression in cancer cells. Among the gynecological cancers, EC exhibits the highest levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression and has the highest proportion of MSI-H. Thus, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is expected to be effective. The first ICI to show efficacy in recurrent EC was the anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab, which exhibited efficacy in MSI-H EC. The combination of pembrolizumab and the multi-kinase inhibitor lenvatinib significantly prolongs OS/PFS compared with single-agent chemotherapy in previously treated recurrent EC, regardless of MSI status. ICIs are now moving from second-line and beyond to first-line treatment regimens. The efficacy of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) and ICI combinations compared with TC have been demonstrated, including an ongoing Phase III trial comparing chemotherapy with the combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib. Although ICIs are becoming the mainstay of EC, they cause systemic inflammatory side effects known as irAEs. The incidence of irAEs is higher for combination therapy with CT or lenvatinib compared with ICI therapy alone. Even though they are rarely fatal, irAEs should be addressed promptly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38913219What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.