Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2024
Applicability of Deep Learning to Dynamically Identify the Different Organs of the Pelvic Floor in the Midsagittal Plane.
Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of artificial intelligence to ultrasound imaging for benign gynecological disorders: systematic review.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025Pooled it
- An AI-assisted Clinical Decision Support System for Green Classification of Cystocele on Dynamic Transperineal Ultrasound.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Males with Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: An Up-to-Date UPOINTS-Based Narrative Mapping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Automated extraction of the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions and mid-sagittal plane from 3D transperineal ultrasound.Medical physics · 2026Article
- PFUS1: Premier pelvic floor ultrasound segmentation dataset. A resource for advancing research.Data in brief · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence to Determine Correct Midsagittal Plane in Dynamic Transperineal Ultrasound.Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2025Observational
- Automated Evaluation of Female Pelvic Organ Descent on Transperineal Ultrasound: Model Development and Validation.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
- Ultrasound Diagnosis of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using Artificial Intelligence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- An optimized deep learning model based on transperineal ultrasound images for precision diagnosis of female stress urinary incontinence.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe objective was to create and validate the usefulness of a convolutional neural network (CNN) for identifying different organs of the pelvic floor in the midsagittal plane via dynamic ultrasound.
methodsThis observational and prospective study included 110 patients. Transperineal ultrasound scans were performed by an expert sonographer of the pelvic floor. A video of each patient was made that captured the midsagittal plane of the pelvic floor at rest and the change in the pelvic structures during the Valsalva maneuver. After saving the captured videos, we manually labeled the different organs in each video. Three different architectures were tested-UNet, FPN, and LinkNet-to determine which CNN model best recognized anatomical structures. The best model was trained with the 86 cases for the number of epochs determined by the stop criterion via cross-validation. The Dice Similarity Index (DSI) was used for CNN validation.
resultsEighty-six patients were included to train the CNN and 24 to test the CNN. After applying the trained CNN to the 24 test videos, we did not observe any failed segmentation. In fact, we obtained a DSI of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73 - 0.82) as the median of the 24 test videos. When we studied the organs independently, we observed differences in the DSI of each organ. The poorest DSIs were obtained in the bladder (0.71 [95% CI: 0.70 - 0.73]) and uterus (0.70 [95% CI: 0.68 - 0.74]), whereas the highest DSIs were obtained in the anus (0.81 [95% CI: 0.80 - 0.86]) and levator ani muscle (0.83 [95% CI: 0.82 - 0.83]).
conclusionsOur results show that it is possible to apply deep learning using a trained CNN to identify different pelvic floor organs in the midsagittal plane via dynamic ultrasound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.