ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2024
Development and Pilot Test of a Multi-Component Intervention to Support Women's Recovery from Female Genital Fistula.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Geographic Access Barrier as a Critical Mediator in Obstetric Fistula Treatment Cascade in Nigeria: Evidence from a Causal Mediation Analysis of 5,496 Cases.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisWe evaluated a pilot multi-component reintegration intervention to improve women's physical and psychosocial quality of life after genital fistula surgery.
methodsTwelve women undergoing fistula repair at Mulago Specialized Women and Neonatal Hospital (Kampala, Uganda) anticipated in a 2-week multi-component intervention including health education, psychosocial therapy, physiotherapy, and economic investment. We assessed feasibility through recruitment, retention, and adherence, acceptability through intervention satisfaction, and preliminary effectiveness through reintegration, mental health, physical health, and economic status. We collected quantitative data at enrollment, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. We conducted in-depth interviews with six participants. Quantitative data are presented descriptively, and qualitative data analyzed thematically.
resultsParticipants had a median age of 34.5 years (25.5-38.0), 50% were married/partnered, 42% were separated, 50$ had completed less than primary education, and 67% were unemployed. Mean number of sessions received was 12 for health education (range 5-15), 8 for counseling (range 8-9), and 6 for physiotherapy (range 4-8). Feasibility was demonstrated by study acceptance among all those eligible (100%); comfort with study measures, data collection frequency and approach; and procedural fidelity. Acceptability was high; all participants reported being very satisfied with the intervention and each of the components. Participant narratives echoed quantitative findings and contributed nuanced perspectives to understanding approach and content.
conclusionsOur results suggest that the intervention and associated research were both feasible and acceptable, and suggested certain modifications to the intervention protocol to reduce participant burden. Further research to determine the effectiveness of the intervention above and beyond surgery alone with regard to the health and well-being of women with fistulas is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.