Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38913125›Full record

ArticleJournal of sex research2025

Coerced Condomless Sex: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Studies.

Weiqi Chen, Mitchell Kirwan, Julia F Hammett, Robin Stewart, Kelly Cue Davis

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sex research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Weiqi ChenEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University.
Mitchell KirwanDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at El Paso.
Julia F HammettEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University.
Robin StewartEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University.
Kelly Cue DavisEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University.

Funding

Men's Sexual Risk Behaviors: Alcohol, Sexual Aggression, and Emotional FactorsR37AA025212 · NIAAA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI Kelly Cue Davis · 2018 to 2026
$3.8M
Alcohol and Condom Use Resistance in Sexually Coercive/Violent MenR01AA017608 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVIS, KELLY CUE · 2009 to 2013
$2.1M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017608NIAAA NIH HHS R37 AA025212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coerced condomless sex is a prevalent form of sexual coercion that is associated with severe negative health consequences. This scoping review addresses the current lack of synthesized qualitative evidence on coerced condomless sex. Our systematic literature search yielded 21 articles that met review eligibility criteria. Themes of coerced condomless sex were organized into three categories (tactics, motives, and sequelae) and presented separately for studies based on whether researchers stipulated pregnancy promotion intent as underlying the behavior. Coerced condomless sex perpetration tactics ranged from verbal pressure to physical assault. Besides pregnancy promotion, perpetration motives included control, dominance, entrapment, enhancing sexual experiences, and avoiding conflict. Following coerced condomless sex, victims reported developing protective strategies. They also reported experiencing various negative emotional, relational, and physical health effects. Interventions that specifically address coerced condomless sex perpetration and provide supportive programs for those who have experienced coercive condomless sex may be beneficial.

Indexed as

CoercionSexual BehaviorUnsafe SexFemaleHumansMaleQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID38913125
PMCPMC11666806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.