Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38912829›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2024

Capecitabine monotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced HER2-normal breast cancer - a nationwide, retrospective study.

Alan Celik, Tobias Berg, Magnus Gibson, Maj-Britt Jensen, Iben Kümler, Saskia Eßer-Naumann, Erik H Jakobsen, Ann Knoop, Dorte Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alan CelikDanish Breast Cancer Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. alan.celik.01@regionh.dk.
Tobias BergDanish Breast Cancer Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Magnus GibsonDanish Breast Cancer Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maj-Britt JensenDanish Breast Cancer Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Iben KümlerDepartment of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Saskia Eßer-NaumannZealand University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Naestved, Denmark.
Erik H JakobsenHospital of Southern Jutland, Department of Oncology, Sonderborg, Denmark.
Ann Knoop *Department of Clinical Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dorte Nielsen *Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Capecitabine can be used as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. However, real-world data on efficacy of capecitabine in this setting is sparse. The purpose of the study is to evaluate outcomes of patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER2)-normal advanced breast cancer treated with capecitabine monotherapy as first-line treatment. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe study utilized the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) database and was conducted retrospectively across all Danish oncology departments. Inclusion criteria were female patients, with HER2-normal advanced breast cancer treated with capecitabine monotherapy as the first-line treatment from 2010 to 2020. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

resultsA total of 494 patients were included. Median OS was 16.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.5-18.0), and median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI: 5.3-6.7). Patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease had significantly longer OS (median: 22.8 vs. 10.5 months, p < 0.001) and PFS (median: 7.4 vs. 4.9 months, p = 0.003), when compared to ER-negative patients. Stratifying by age, patients under 45 years displayed a median PFS of 4.1 months, while those aged 45-70 years and over 70 years had median PFS of 5.7 and 7.2 months, respectively (p = 0.01).

interpretationIn this nationwide study, the efficacy of capecitabine as a first-line treatment for HER2-normal advanced breast cancer is consistent with other, mainly retrospective, studies. However, when assessed against contemporary and newer treatments, its effectiveness appears inferior to alternative chemotherapies or targeted therapies.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCapecitabineErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDenmarkFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalReceptors, EstrogenRetrospective StudiesAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCapecitabineERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID38912829
PMCPMC11332473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.