Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38912779›Full record

ReviewNatural product reports2024

Advances, opportunities, and challenges in methods for interrogating the structure activity relationships of natural products.

Christine Mae F Ancajas, Abiodun S Oyedele, Caitlin M Butt, Allison S Walker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Natural product reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christine Mae F AncajasDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. allison.s.walker@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5697-2202
Abiodun S OyedeleDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. allison.s.walker@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9528-5288
Caitlin M ButtDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. allison.s.walker@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID 0009-0004-5701-8102
Allison S WalkerDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. allison.s.walker@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5666-7232

Funding

Machine learning approaches for the discovery, repurposing, and optimization of natural products with therapeutic potential - Supplement to support grad training of Adrian RussR35GM146987 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Allison Sara Walker · 2022 to 2026
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM146987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time span in literature: 1985-early 2024Natural products play a key role in drug discovery, both as a direct source of drugs and as a starting point for the development of synthetic compounds. Most natural products are not suitable to be used as drugs without further modification due to insufficient activity or poor pharmacokinetic properties. Choosing what modifications to make requires an understanding of the compound's structure-activity relationships. Use of structure-activity relationships is commonplace and essential in medicinal chemistry campaigns applied to human-designed synthetic compounds. Structure-activity relationships have also been used to improve the properties of natural products, but several challenges still limit these efforts. Here, we review methods for studying the structure-activity relationships of natural products and their limitations. Specifically, we will discuss how synthesis, including total synthesis, late-stage derivatization, chemoenzymatic synthetic pathways, and engineering and genome mining of biosynthetic pathways can be used to produce natural product analogs and discuss the challenges of each of these approaches. Finally, we will discuss computational methods including machine learning methods for analyzing the relationship between biosynthetic genes and product activity, computer aided drug design techniques, and interpretable artificial intelligence approaches towards elucidating structure-activity relationships from models trained to predict bioactivity from chemical structure. Our focus will be on these latter topics as their applications for natural products have not been extensively reviewed. We suggest that these methods are all complementary to each other, and that only collaborative efforts using a combination of these techniques will result in a full understanding of the structure-activity relationships of natural products.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsBiosynthetic PathwaysDrug DiscoveryHumansMolecular StructureStructure-Activity RelationshipBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID38912779
PMCPMC11484176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.