Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38912455›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Prognostic value analysis and survival model construction of different treatment methods for advanced intestinal type gastric adenocarcinoma.

Shuangai Liu, Yizhou Zhuang, Qibo Fu, Zhongyuan Zhang, Kai Hang, Ting Tao, Lei Liu, Jiheng Wu, Yuanmei Liu, Jinhu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shuangai LiuDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Yizhou ZhuangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Geriatric Diseases, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Provincial Institute of Clinical Geriatrics, Fuzhou, China.
Qibo FuNational Clinical Trial Institute, The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China.
Zhongyuan ZhangPediatric Cancer Research Center, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China.
Kai HangPediatric Cancer Research Center, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China.
Ting TaoPediatric Cancer Research Center, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China.
Lei LiuDepartment of Pathology, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jiheng WuPediatric Cancer Research Center, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China.
Yuanmei LiuDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Jinhu WangPediatric Cancer Research Center, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma, representing 95 % of gastric malignancies, originates from the malignant transformation of gastric gland cells. Despite its prevalence, existing methods for prognosis evaluation of this cancer subtype are inadequate. This study aims to enhance patient-specific prognosis evaluation by analyzing the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic risk factors of intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma patients using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Methods: We extracted clinical data for patients diagnosed with intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2015 from the SEER database, selecting 257 cases based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Independent risk factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were identified using a Cox regression model. A nomogram model for predicting OS or CSS was developed from the Cox risk regression analysis and validated through the consistency index (C-index), ROC curve, and calibration curve. Results: Age, primary tumor resection, chemotherapy, lymph node metastasis, and tumor size were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS (P < 0.05). The nomogram model, constructed from these indicators, demonstrated superior predictive consistency for OS and CSS compared to the AJCC-TNM staging system. ROC curve analysis confirmed the model's higher accuracy, and calibration curve analysis indicated good agreement between the nomogram's predictions and actual observed outcomes. Conclusion: The nomogram model derived from SEER database analyses accurately predicts OS and CSS for patients with intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma. This model promises to facilitate more tailored treatments in clinical practice.

Indexed as

CSSIntestinal type gastric adenocarcinomaNomogramOSPrognosis analysis

Identifiers

PMID38912455
PMCPMC11190592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.