Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38912449›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Deep-GenMut: Automated genetic mutation classification in oncology: A deep learning comparative study.

Emad A Elsamahy, Asmaa E Ahmed, Tahseen Shoala, Fahima A Maghraby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An enhanced transformer model for detecting 1p36 deletion syndrome.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emad A ElsamahyCollege of Computing and Information Technology, Arab Academy for Science, Technology, and Maritime Transport, Cairo, Egypt.
Asmaa E AhmedCollege of Computing and Information Technology, Arab Academy for Science, Technology, and Maritime Transport, Cairo, Egypt.
Tahseen ShoalaEnvironmental Biotechnology Department, College of Biotechnology, Misr University for Science and Technology, Giza, 12563, Egypt.
Fahima A MaghrabyCollege of Computing and Information Technology, Arab Academy for Science, Technology, and Maritime Transport, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early cancer detection and treatment depend on the discovery of specific genes that cause cancer. The classification of genetic mutations was initially done manually. However, this process relies on pathologists and can be a time-consuming task. Therefore, to improve the precision of clinical interpretation, researchers have developed computational algorithms that leverage next-generation sequencing technologies for automated mutation analysis. This paper utilized four deep learning classification models with training collections of biomedical texts. These models comprise bidirectional encoder representations from transformers for Biomedical text mining (BioBERT), a specialized language model implemented for biological contexts. Impressive results in multiple tasks, including text classification, language inference, and question answering, can be obtained by simply adding an extra layer to the BioBERT model. Moreover, bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT), long short-term memory (LSTM), and bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM) have been leveraged to produce very good results in categorizing genetic mutations based on textual evidence. The dataset used in the work was created by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), which contains several mutations. Furthermore, this dataset poses a major classification challenge in the Kaggle research prediction competitions. In carrying out the work, three challenges were identified: enormous text length, biased representation of the data, and repeated data instances. Based on the commonly used evaluation metrics, the experimental results show that the BioBERT model outperforms other models with an F1 score of 0.87 and 0.850 MCC, which can be considered as improved performance compared to similar results in the literature that have an F1 score of 0.70 achieved with the BERT model.

Indexed as

BERTBiLSTMBioBERTCancer detectionDeep learningGenetic mutationLSTMText classification

Identifiers

PMID38912449
PMCPMC11190593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.