Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38912343›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2024

The comparison of preoxygenation methods before endotracheal intubation: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Ming Zhong, Rong Xia, Junyu Zhou, Jing Zhang, Xia Yi, Anbo Yang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Snorkel breathing technique in anesthesia: A narrative review.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ming ZhongDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Rong XiaChongqing Beibei Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Chongqing Hospital of The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine), Chongqing, China.
Junyu ZhouChongqing Beibei Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Chongqing Hospital of The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine), Chongqing, China.
Jing ZhangChongqing Beibei Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Chongqing Hospital of The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine), Chongqing, China.
Xia YiChongqing Beibei Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Chongqing Hospital of The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine), Chongqing, China.
Anbo YangChongqing Beibei Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Chongqing Hospital of The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine), Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preoxygenation before endotracheal intubation (ETI) maintains asphyxiated oxygenation and reduces the risk of hypoxia-induced adverse events. Previous studies have compared various preoxygenation methods. However, network meta-analyses (NMAs) of the combined comparison of preoxygenation methods is still lacking. Methods: We searched for studies published in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Review Manager version 5.3 was used to evaluate the risk of bias. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was low oxygen saturation (SpO Results: A total of 15 randomized controlled trials were included in this study. Regarding the lowest SpO Conclusion: Network analysis revealed that NIV for preoxygenation achieved higher SpO Systematic review registration: identifier CRD42022346013.

Indexed as

endotracheal intubationnetwork meta-analysispreoxygenationrandomized clinical trialventilation

Identifiers

PMID38912343
PMCPMC11190303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.