Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38912315›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

36-Month Outcomes of Ahmed ClearPath

Nithya Boopathiraj, Isabella V Wagner, Paul Connor Lentz, Leticia Checo, Emily Aashna Dorairaj, Abhimanyu S Ahuja, Darby D Miller, Syril Dorairaj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Outcomes of the Ahmed clearpath glaucoma drainage device in glaucoma: a systematic review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nithya BoopathirajDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Isabella V WagnerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5386-3692
Paul Connor LentzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Leticia ChecoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Emily Aashna DorairajDepartment of Medicine, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, FL, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-7171-1308
Abhimanyu S AhujaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4333-9189
Darby D MillerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4920-0970
Syril DorairajDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Ahmed ClearPath Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective case series focused on adult patients diagnosed with severe POAG who underwent implantation of an ACP GDD. Over a 36-month follow-up period, data on intraocular pressure (IOP), the number of glaucoma medications, and complications were recorded. The primary objectives were to assess the reductions from baseline in both IOP and medication usage, through 36 months. Secondary objectives included the proportion of eyes achieving an IOP reduction of ≥ 20% from baseline at 36 months. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also assessed. Results: Twelve eyes from 11 patients (mean age: 71.3 ± 14.1 years) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. All patients had severe POAG (n=11), with the majority being Caucasian (n=8) and female (n=10). The mean (standard deviation) IOP and number of glaucoma medications at baseline were 29 (7.6) mmHg and 3 (0.9), respectively. At 36 months, mean IOP was reduced to 10.6 (5.5) mmHg (-61.8%; p= 0.0008) and mean number of medications was reduced to 0.9 (0.9) (-71.4%; p=0.0005), with 88.9% of eyes achieving an IOP reduction by ≥20%. No vision threatening complications were observed. Conclusion: To our knowledge this is the first study to report 36-month outcomes of the novel ACP device in the treatment of refractory POAG. The safety profile and efficacy of the ACP was found to be comparable to that of other commonly utilized GDD models.

Indexed as

glaucoma drainage deviceintraocular pressureprimary open angle glaucoma

Identifiers

PMID38912315
PMCPMC11193400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.