Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38912269›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Capacity-building during public health emergencies: perceived usefulness and cost savings of an online training on SARS-CoV-2 real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) diagnostics in low- and middle-income settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Heide Weishaar, Francisco Pozo-Martin, Brogan Geurts, Estibaliz Lopez de Abechuco, Eloisa Montt-Maray, Florin Cristea, Seth Kofi Abrokwa, Thurid Bahr, Sameh Al-Awlaqi, Charbel El Bcheraoui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Heide Weishaar *Evidence-Based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Francisco Pozo-Martin *Evidence-Based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Brogan GeurtsEvidence-Based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Estibaliz Lopez de AbechucoEvidence-Based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Eloisa Montt-MarayEvidence-Based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Florin CristeaEvidence-Based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Seth Kofi AbrokwaEvidence-Based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Thurid BahrEvidence-Based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Sameh Al-AwlaqiEvidence-Based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Charbel El BcheraouiEvidence-Based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Upon the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Public Health Laboratory Support Unit (ZIG4) at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the German National Public Health Institute, developed and delivered an online training on SARS-CoV-2 qPCR diagnostics to 17 partner countries in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This article analyses the usefulness and cost savings of this training. Methods: The authors performed a concurrent mixed-methodology study based on key informant interviews, interviewer-administered questionnaires, and document reviews. Economic costs were estimated from the perspective of RKI. Results: Responding participants indicated that the course provided good and comprehensive information on up-to-date scientific knowledge and laboratory practice in PCR diagnostics. Respondents appreciated how the technical content of the training enhanced their ability to apply diagnostic methods in their daily work. Interviewees highlighted that the fast implementation and the low threshold of attending an online training had allowed them to quickly build skills that were crucial during, and beyond, the COVID-19 crisis. The total estimated cost of the online SARS-CoV-2 qPCR training was 61,644 euros. The total estimated cost of the equivalent face-to-face training was estimated at 267,592 euros. Programme weaknesses identified included the top-down approaches taken, lack of interactive components and opportunities to directly engage with other course participants and with teachers. Conclusions: An online training was developed and implemented to support RKI partner countries in SARS-CoV-2 qPCR diagnostics during the COVID-19 pandemic, thereby strengthening pandemic response and health system resilience. The training incurred in important cost savings compared to the equivalent face-to-face training. Post-pandemic studies could usefully build on these research findings and explore ways to enhance end user involvement and improve interactive features to build stronger communities of learners and facilitate exchange of information and mutual learning.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingCost SavingsCOVID-19Developing CountriesPublic HealthReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSARS-CoV-2Education, DistanceGermanyHumansPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairescostCOVID-19diagnosticsonline trainingusefulness

Identifiers

PMID38912269
PMCPMC11192048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.