ReviewBiophysics reviews2024
Engineered heart tissue: Design considerations and the state of the art.
Review in Biophysics reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Desmoplakin Loss Leads to PKC- and Src-Mediated Contractile Dysfunction in Cardiomyocytes.Circulation research · 2026Article
- An Integrated Cardiac Microtissue Proteome Map Extends Therapeutic Remodeling by Nanovesicles.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- Review
- Human iPSC-derived 3D cardiac models for cardiomyopathies: organoids, spheroids, and engineered heart tissues as translational platforms.Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) · 2026Review
- Engineering Smart Biomaterial Interfaces for iPSC-CM Maturation: A Biophysical and Metabolic Reprogramming Approach to Regenerative Cardiac Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential of Human Cardiomyocyte Proliferation.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Evaluating and improving biocompatibility of conductive polymers for cardiac tissue engineering.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2026Review
- Advancements in techniques for human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes maturation: mechanical and electrical stimulation approaches.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Review
- The Past, the Present, and the Future of Genomic Therapies in Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Originally developed more than 20 years ago, engineered heart tissue (EHT) has become an important tool in cardiovascular research for applications such as disease modeling and drug screening. Innovations in biomaterials, stem cell biology, and bioengineering, among other fields, have enabled EHT technologies to recapitulate many aspects of cardiac physiology and pathophysiology. While initial EHT designs were inspired by the isolated-trabecula culture system, current designs encompass a variety of formats, each of which have unique strengths and limitations. In this review, we describe the most common EHT formats, and then systematically evaluate each aspect of their design, emphasizing the rational selection of components for each application.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.