ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2024
Shifting to an app-based method of preoperative templating in orthopaedic surgery.
Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preoperative templating plays an important part in attaining successful surgical outcomes after fracture fixation. Traditionally, surgeons have performed this task with printed radiographs, tracing paper, and colored markers. Now that digital radiography is ubiquitous, and digital templating platforms are needed but are expensive and may not be available to all surgeons, especially those in low-income and middle-income countries. In this study, we evaluate an innovative and user-friendly method using a mobile app that may facilitate the use of digital templating for all surgeons worldwide. Methods: A study involving 2 groups of residents (N = 12) was conducted. Group A (n = 6) was assigned to do conventional templating; Group B (n = 6) was assigned to perform digital templating. Each group then switched to the other templating method and the process was repeated. Conventional templates were evaluated using the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen-Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO-ASIF) guidelines of template completeness. Digital templates were assessed using Image-Based Surgery Planning. Each subject in both groups completed templates for 3 injury patterns: AO 2R2A3/2U2C2, 32B2, and 43C2. Wilcoxon signed-rank and binomial tests (5% level of significance) were used for statistical analysis. Results: Template processing, fracture classification, and plan elaboration were comparable between the traditional and digital template groups, with good interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test ( Conclusions: This study shows that digital templating can achieve the same goals as conventional preoperative templating for fracture fixation. With the ubiquity of digital radiography, digital templating provides an opportunity to visualize fracture configurations and create an optimum preoperative plan for fracture reconstruction using an innovative and user-friendly platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.