Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38912099›Full record

ArticleHong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT2024

Work-support techniques used by occupational therapists to facilitate support after acquired brain injuries: A qualitative study.

Ryoko Kurihara, Toru Nagao, Rumi Tanemura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryoko KuriharaTeikyo Heisei University, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2393-0035
Toru NagaoKobe University, Japan.
Rumi TanemuraKansai Medical University, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ensuring effective return to work following acquired brain injuries is crucial from the perspectives of both quality of life and the economy. However, techniques of occupational therapy support for return to work remain relatively unelucidated. Aims/Objectives: To clarify the specific contents of occupational therapy required for work and work support for clients with acquired brain injuries. Material and Methods: An interview-based survey was conducted with participants who had >10 years of occupational therapy experience and had provided work support. We selected participants via snowball sampling. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: A total of 20 participants (15 women and 5 men; 6, 12, 1, and 1 in their 30s, 40s, 50s, and 60s, respectively) were included. Six concepts were generated on reviewing the support for work items considered important by the occupational therapist as follows: "Support for vocational life," "Support for interpersonal skills," "Support for work," "Support for illness, disability, and awareness," "Support for utilization of compensation measures," and "Support for goal setting." Conclusions: We clarified the specific contents of work support, including support for vocational life and support for work, that is administered by occupational therapists who provide work support for clients with acquired brain injury. The insights from the study improve understanding of OTs' roles and contributions in supporting clients with acquired brain injuries in returning to work.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular diseasehead injuriestraumatic brain injuriesvocational trainingwork rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID38912099
PMCPMC11192432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.