ArticlePeerJ2024
VOE: automated analysis of variant epitopes of SARS-CoV-2 for the development of diagnostic tests or vaccines for COVID-19.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RNA-SeqEZPZ: a point-and-click pipeline for comprehensive transcriptomics analysis with interactive visualizations.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The development of serodiagnostic tests and vaccines for COVID-19 depends on the identification of epitopes from the SARS-CoV-2 genome. An epitope is the specific part of an antigen that is recognized by the immune system and can elicit an immune response. However, when the genetic variants contained in epitopes are used to develop rapid antigen tests (Ag-RDTs) and DNA or RNA vaccines, test sensitivity and vaccine efficacy can be low. Methods: Here, we developed a "variant on epitope (VOE)" software, a new Python script for identifying variants located on an epitope. Variant analysis and sensitivity calculation for seven recommended epitopes were processed by VOE. Variants in 1,011 Omicron SRA reads from two variant databases (BCFtools and SARS-CoV-2-Freebayes) were processed by VOE. Results: A variant with HIGH or MODERATE impact was found on all epitopes from both variant databases except the epitopes KLNDLCFTNV, RVQPTES, LKPFERD, and ITLCFTLKRK on the S gene and ORF7a gene. All epitope variants from the BCFtools and SARS-CoV-2 Freebayes variant databases showed about 100% sensitivity except epitopes APGQTGK and DSKVGGNYN on the S gene, which showed respective sensitivities of 28.4866% and 6.8249%, and 87.7349% and 71.1177%. Conclusions: Therefore, the epitopes KLNDLCFTNV, RVQPTES, LKPFERD, and ITLCFTLKRK may be useful for the development of an epitope-based peptide vaccine and GGDGKMKD on the N gene may be useful for the development of serodiagnostic tests. Moreover, VOE can also be used to analyze other epitopes, and a new variant database for VOE may be further established when a new variant of SARS-CoV-2 emerges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.