Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38911980›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

GranoScan: an AI-powered mobile app for in-field identification of biotic threats of wheat.

Riccardo Dainelli, Antonio Bruno, Massimo Martinelli, Davide Moroni, Leandro Rocchi, Silvia Morelli, Emilio Ferrari, Marco Silvestri, Simone Agostinelli, Paolo La Cava and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Riccardo DainelliInstitute of BioEconomy (IBE), National Research Council (CNR), Firenze, Italy.
Antonio BrunoInstitute of Information Science and Technologies (ISTI), National Research Council (CNR), Pisa, Italy.
Massimo MartinelliInstitute of Information Science and Technologies (ISTI), National Research Council (CNR), Pisa, Italy.
Davide MoroniInstitute of Information Science and Technologies (ISTI), National Research Council (CNR), Pisa, Italy.
Leandro RocchiInstitute of BioEconomy (IBE), National Research Council (CNR), Firenze, Italy.
Silvia MorelliBarilla G. e R. Fratelli S.p.A., Parma, Italy.
Emilio FerrariBarilla G. e R. Fratelli S.p.A., Parma, Italy.
Marco SilvestriBarilla G. e R. Fratelli S.p.A., Parma, Italy.
Simone AgostinelliBarilla G. e R. Fratelli S.p.A., Parma, Italy.
Paolo La CavaBarilla G. e R. Fratelli S.p.A., Parma, Italy.
Piero ToscanoInstitute of BioEconomy (IBE), National Research Council (CNR), Firenze, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capitalizing on the widespread adoption of smartphones among farmers and the application of artificial intelligence in computer vision, a variety of mobile applications have recently emerged in the agricultural domain. This paper introduces GranoScan, a freely available mobile app accessible on major online platforms, specifically designed for the real-time detection and identification of over 80 threats affecting wheat in the Mediterranean region. Developed through a co-design methodology involving direct collaboration with Italian farmers, this participatory approach resulted in an app featuring: (i) a graphical interface optimized for diverse in-field lighting conditions, (ii) a user-friendly interface allowing swift selection from a predefined menu, (iii) operability even in low or no connectivity, (iv) a straightforward operational guide, and (v) the ability to specify an area of interest in the photo for targeted threat identification. Underpinning GranoScan is a deep learning architecture named efficient minimal adaptive ensembling that was used to obtain accurate and robust artificial intelligence models. The method is based on an ensembling strategy that uses as core models two instances of the EfficientNet-b0 architecture, selected through the weighted F1-score. In this phase a very good precision is reached with peaks of 100% for pests, as well as in leaf damage and root disease tasks, and in some classes of spike and stem disease tasks. For weeds in the post-germination phase, the precision values range between 80% and 100%, while 100% is reached in all the classes for pre-flowering weeds, except one. Regarding recognition accuracy towards end-users in-field photos, GranoScan achieved good performances, with a mean accuracy of 77% and 95% for leaf diseases and for spike, stem and root diseases, respectively. Pests gained an accuracy of up to 94%, while for weeds the app shows a great ability (100% accuracy) in recognizing whether the target weed is a dicot or monocot and 60% accuracy for distinguishing species in both the post-germination and pre-flowering stage. Our precision and accuracy results conform to or outperform those of other studies deploying artificial intelligence models on mobile devices, confirming that GranoScan is a valuable tool also in challenging outdoor conditions.

Indexed as

co-design thinkingdeep learningdiseasefree mobile appin-field recognitionpestweedwinter cereals

Identifiers

PMID38911980
PMCPMC11190326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.