ArticleF1000Research2023
Comparative evaluation of clinical performance, child and parental satisfaction of Bioflx, zirconia and stainless steel crowns in pediatric patients.
Article in F1000Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Retention and Resistance to Dislodgement of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars
Evaluation Of Occlusal Wear Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars
Digital Occlusal Analysis and Bite Force Evaluation of Pulp Treated Primary Molars Restored With Zirconia Crowns Using T-Scan: An Experimental Before-and-After Study
Digital Occlusal Analysis and Bite Force Evaluation of Hall Technique Vs Stainless-Steel Crowns as Conventional Restoration of Carious Primary Molars Using T-scan: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Vertical Dimension Changes and Mean Biting Force Following Bioflx Placement Over Pulp-treated Primary Molars Versus Stainless Steel Crowns: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and radiographic success of bioflex versus stainless steel crowns using the hall technique in primary molars: a 12-month randomized controlled trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Trial
- Comparative evaluation of hybrid resin polymer crowns versus preformed metal crowns in primary molars of children aged 3-7 years: a prospective parallel-group clinical study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Article
- Bioflex crowns in pediatric dentistry: a scoping review of current evidence and clinical applications.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- To Evaluate Clinical Performance of Preformed Zirconia Crowns, Computer-aided Design and Computer-aided Manufacturing Zirconia Crowns, and Bioflx Crowns in Primary Molars Postendodontic Therapy.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Success with Preformed Stainless Steel Crowns and Bioflx Crowns: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2026Article
- Marginal and internal adaptation of esthetic crowns for primary molars: an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Bite Force Distribution and Occlusal Adjustment in Stainless Steel Crowns and BioFlx Crowns of Children Aged 4-8 Years.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2026Article
- Clinical Evaluation of BioFlx Crowns for the Restoration of Primary Teeth.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Esthetic Zirconia Crowns in Children: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- BioFlx Pediatric Crowns: Current Evidence on Clinical Outcomes and Material Properties.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Retention of Bioflx, Zirconia, and Stainless Steel crowns using two different luting cements in primary molars: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Antagonistic Primary Tooth Wear Caused by Opposing BioFLXInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Influence of luting cement on the biomechanical behavior of Bioflx crowns.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Bioflx Crowns, Preformed Zirconia Crowns, and CAD/CAM Crowns-Resistant to Fracture: AnInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Surface roughness and wear performance of Bioflx versus stainless-steel primary crowns (an in-vitro study).BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Thermomechanical aging effects on vertical marginal gap and fracture resistance: a comparative study of Bioflx and traditional pediatric crowns.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Review
- Comparative evaluation of clinical performance, child and parental satisfaction of Bioflx, zirconia and stainless steel crowns in pediatric patients.F1000Research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pediatric dental treatment is challenging in patients with early childhood caries. For clinician its difficult to manage child and provide good work at the same time. Its necessity to have the best equipments as well as materials. Nowadays, aesthetics play an important role in managing decayed teeth. Zirconia crown is better option but requires excessive preparation. As Bioflx is newly developed crown and has combined stainless steel and zirconia properties. Aim: To assess the clinical performance and child and parental satisfaction of Bioflex crowns compared to zirconia and stainless steel crowns. Methods: In this comparative study of Bioflx crowns with zirconia and stainless steel crowns, children aged three to seven years old will be selected, and 72 primary teeth requiring crowns will be randomly distributed into three groups, n = 24: Results: Bioflx crown will have better clinical as well as parental satisfaction among zirconia and stainless steel crowns. Conclusions: The Bioflx crown can be used as an alternative economical esthetic full-coronal restoration for primary teeth. Trial registration: CTRI registration number: CTRI/2023/05/052256; Date of registration: May 03, 2023. Protocol version: Two; Date: April 22, 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.